Managing Hypertention in the Emergency Department: Hypertensive Emergency, Hypertensive Urgency, Chronic Hypertension l 2015 EB Medicine
TOC Will Appear Here

An Evidence-Based Approach To Managing Asymptomatic Elevated Blood Pressure In The Emergency Department

Below is a free preview. Log in or subscribe for full access. Or, get a free sample article Emergency Department Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in the Nonpregnant Patient:
Please provide a valid email address.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
  1. Abstract
  2. Case Presentations
  3. Introduction
    1. Defining Hypertension
  4. Critical Appraisal Of The Literature
    1. Available Guidelines For Hypertension Management
  5. Etiology And Pathophysiology
    1. Epidemiology
    2. Risk Factors
    3. Etiology
    4. Pathophysiology
    5. Effects Of Long-Term Hypertension
  6. Differential Diagnosis
  7. Prehospital Care
  8. Emergency Department Evaluation
    1. Measuring Blood Pressure
    2. History
    3. Physical Examination
  9. Diagnostic Studies
    1. Laboratory Studies
    2. Chest Radiographs
    3. Electrocardiogram
    4. Echocardiogram
    5. Other Testing
  10. Treatment
    1. Treatment Thresholds And Pharmacologic Therapies
    2. Emergency Clinician–Initiated Antihypertensive Treatment
    3. Lifestyle Modifications
  11. Clinical Pathway For Management Of Elevated Blood Pressure In The Emergency Department
  12. Special Populations
    1. Racial And Ethnic Disparities
    2. Sex Considerations
    3. Pregnancy
    4. Age Differences
  13. Controversies And Cutting Edge
    1. Making An Emergency Department Diagnosis Of Hypertension
    2. Public Health Considerations
    3. System-Wide Solutions
  14. Disposition
    1. Discharge
    2. Readmission
  15. Summary
  16. Risk Management Pitfalls For Hypertension In The Emergency Department
  17. Cost-Effective Strategies
  18. Case Conclusions
  19. Tables and Figures
    1. Table 1. Acute End Organ Dysfunction In Hypertensive Emergencies
    2. Table 2. Definitions Of Hypertension
    3. Table 3. Central Questions When Treating Hypertension In The Emergency Department
    4. Table 4. Secondary Hypertension Causes And Making A Diagnosis
    5. Table 5. Differential Diagnosis Of Hypertension In The Emergency Department
    6. Table 6. Key Questions Regarding History Of The Present Illness
    7. Table 7. Emergency Department Laboratory Testing
    8. Table 8. Medication Recommendations For The Management Of Hypertension
    9. Table 9. Recommended First Line Medications For Hypertension Management
    10. Figure 1. Left Ventricular Hypertrophy On Electrocardiogram
  20. References


Hypertension is a common chronic illness that affects 50 million individuals in the United States and approximately 30% of adults worldwide. United States emergency departments report > 900,000 annual visits for hypertension-related complaints and studies show that approximately one-third of patients with elevated blood pressure lack a formal prior diagnosis. These patients are at risk for long-term morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular, ocular, and neurological consequences. This review examines the most current evidence regarding emergency department treatment of asymptomatic hypertension, including differentiating hypertensive emergency from poorly controlled hypertension, recommendations for choosing appropriate treatment, determining the need for admission, and guidelines for disposition and follow-up.

Case Presentations

You start your shift on Monday morning with a 52-year-old woman referred by her primary care physician’s office for a blood pressure of 190/120 mm Hg. She had been previously diagnosed with hypertension and presented for her regular physical that day. When you see her, she has a blood pressure of 160/100 mm Hg and denies headache, chest pain, shortness of breath, or any vision changes. Her physical exam is normal. She confesses that she has been poorly compliant with her hydrochlorothiazide. You wonder why she was sent to the ED, but now that she is here, what should you do?

Several patients later, you see a 35-year-old uninsured man presenting for an ankle sprain. His blood pressure is persistently elevated at 220/110 mm Hg during his stay. He carries no prior diagnosis of hypertension and only complains of severe pain in his ankle. Despite treatment with oxycodone and alleviation of his pain, he remains significantly hypertensive. You wonder if you should treat the blood pressure…

Your next patient is a 78-year-old woman who is brought in by her family for a concern of new-onset hypertension. She has no recent medical history and is on no medications. She had her blood pressure checked several times over the preceding weeks at a pharmacy, and it was consistently around 150/90 mm Hg. Her exam is normal. She does not have a family physician and the earliest appointment the family has been able to get with an internist is in 3 weeks. The family is appropriately worried and asks you if you could start her on medication, but you aren’t sure if this is the best way to manage this patient.


Emergency clinicians treat hypertension in a variety of contexts: the compliant patient on antihypertensive medications who notes an abnormal blood pressure, the asymptomatic patient with severely elevated blood pressure who carries no prior diagnosis, and the patient presenting in extremis with severe shortness of breath, chest pain, and markedly elevated blood pressure. The focus of this systematic review of the literature is the emergency department (ED) management of asymptomatic hypertension as opposed to hypertensive crisis or hypertensive emergency. Hypertensive emergency or crisis is defined as an acute elevation of blood pressure, typically ≥ 180/120 mm Hg, with end-organ damage involving the brain, heart, kidneys, vasculature, or retina.1,2 While a hypertensive emergency can occur de novo, it usually presents in patients with prior chronic hypertension. Hypertensive urgency is defined as severe hypertension without acute end-organ damage. Some groups advocate distinguishing hypertensive urgency from uncomplicated, severely elevated blood pressure, where patients with urgency have evidence of chronic target-organ damage (see Table 1).3

While there are many guidelines and individual articles on management of asymptomatic elevated blood pressure,1,4,5 there is much provider variability in treatment, largely due to the spectrum of the disease. This review outlines new findings in the field of hypertension, particularly as they pertain to the practice of emergency medicine, and suggests a management algorithm based on the best available evidence.

Defining Hypertension

The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) defines normal blood pressure for adults ≥ 18 years of age as a systolic blood pressure of < 120 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure of < 80 mm Hg.1 Above this cut-off, blood pressure ranges are defined for prehypertension, stage 1 hypertension, and stage 2 hypertension. (See Table 2.) The guidelines suggest that the diagnosis of hypertension is based on the mean of 2 or more properly measured blood pressure readings on each of 2 or more office visits. However, more recently, ambulatory blood pressure and home blood pressure measurements have become acceptable alternatives for diagnosing hypertension. In clinical studies, the term markedly elevated blood pressure is synonymous with the JNC 7 definition of stage 2 hypertension. The stratification of patients into different blood pressure categories helps guide treatment.

The 2013 European Society of Hypertension and European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension have similar definitions for hypertension, but they divide blood pressures < 140/90 mm Hg into 3 categories (optimal, normal, and high-normal) instead adof using the terms normal or prehypertensive.6 See Table 3 for critical considerations in the ED treatment of hypertension.

Critical Appraisal Of The Literature

A search using Ovid Medline® ( was launched for articles published from January 1990 to December 2014. Keywords included hypertension, emergency department, emergency medical services, elevated blood pressure, and hypertensive urgency; 5878 articles were screened for inclusion and 187 articles were determined to be relevant for review. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was also searched and yielded 134 articles, 4 of which were deemed to be appropriate for this review. A search of the National Guidelines Clearinghouse ( produced 113 guidelines. Three guidelines were found to be relevant to the management of elevated blood pressure in ED patients. Additional references were selected from works cited in the reviewed articles.

Risk Management Pitfalls For Hypertension In The Emergency Department

1. “I aggressively treat all patients with elevated blood pressure initially, and then decide who needs to be admitted or discharged based on their response to therapy.”

It is wise to tailor diagnostic and management strategies to the individual patient and to distinguish patients with asymptomatic elevated blood pressure from those presenting with symptoms that are suggestive of end-organ damage or hypertensive emergency. While the former need a blood pressure recheck in days to weeks, the latter may need parenteral therapy and admission (frequently to the intensive care unit setting). Also, blood pressure that is elevated on initial triage measure may decrease without an intervention on recheck. While patients with asymptomatic elevation of blood pressure have a low likelihood of shortterm decompensation, those with hypertensive emergency need parenteral therapy to prevent potentially fatal acute end-organ damage.107

2. “I was reassured by her normal blood pressure in the ED, even though her doctor sent her in for a markedly elevated blood pressure in the office.”

Proper cuff size avoids underestimation of blood pressure in thin individuals and overestimation of blood pressure in obese individuals. Be aware of this with your thin elderly female patients. A standard adult or large-size cuff may lead to underestimation of their blood pressure in the ED.

3. “I gave him clonidine prior to his discharge. I didn’t think he needed to be admitted.”

In patients without end-organ hypertension symptoms or signs, discharge from the ED with follow-up for elevated blood pressure is appropriate. It is not advisable to treat these patients in the ED with parenteral or oral therapy to which they are naïve, simply to improve their vital signs while in the department. Drugs such as clonidine are not considered first-line therapy for hypertensive urgency. In patients who may have chronically elevated blood pressure, they can cause a significant drop in blood pressure, leading to a decrease in cerebral blood flow, with consequent syncope or even stroke.4

4. “The patient’s blood pressure was elevated, but she was well-appearing, so I followed the ACEP clinical policy recommendations and didn’t order any laboratory testing.”

While laboratory testing is not necessary in most patients presenting with symptomatic elevated blood pressure, patients should be screened for end-organ damage and the concerning causes of elevated blood pressure. All women of childbearing age should be asked if they are pregnant or recently gave birth. Undiagnosed pre-eclampsia can lead to renal failure, liver failure, seizures, and cardiovascular morbidity.

5. “The patient was here for a paronychia, I didn’t feel the need to scrutinize his high blood pressure.”

Patients frequently present with elevated blood pressure without symptoms. Hypertension is a widely prevalent disease and there can be a long latency from onset to development of endorgan damage. The ED offers a public health opportunity for early diagnosis, counseling, and referral.

6. “I didn’t address the patient’s elevated blood pressure of 180/100 mm Hg because I assumed that it was due to anxiety from being in the ED.”

Numerous studies support the replicability of ED blood pressures (particularly those above 160/100 mm Hg) in the outpatient setting. Blood pressure measurements should be repeated in these patients, and they should be informed of their abnormal blood pressure readings and receive expedient follow-up, with consideration for a prescription for a first-line antihypertensive medication.

7. “I didn’t counsel the patient on lifestyle strategies to decrease his elevated blood pressure because this is the role of the primary care provider.”

Many of our patients do not have a source of regular primary care or they have long waits to be seen by their primary care providers. Lifestyle changes are a benign, cost-effective, and efficacious means of decreasing blood pressure.

8. “A complete laboratory workup showed no abnormalities, so I felt comfortable discharging her.”

The ACEP clinical policy asserts that patients presenting with elevated blood pressure without a history or examination suggestive of hypertensive emergency need not have extensive laboratory investigations in the ED.7

9. “Other than referring patients with elevated blood pressure and no symptoms, there’s really nothing I feel I can do.”
Many patients may benefit from restarting or increasing the dose of their current blood pressure medication. It is helpful to review over-the-counter and prescription medications with the patient, such as decongestants, steroids, NSAIDs, appetite suppressants, and other medication that can temporarily raise blood pressure.108 Acute blood pressure lowering is not advisable. Changes in blood pressure medications should be coordinated with the primary physician whenever possible.
10. “I wrote him a prescription for lisinopril because I was comfortable with the dosing and I couldn’t reach his primary care provider.”
Prior to starting a new prescription in a patient, the JNC 7 advises obtaining a baseline blood chemistry. It is also critical to review the patient’s other medications to avoid dangerous drug interactions. In patients on potassium supplements or potassium-sparing diuretics, the addition of an ACEI may cause hyperkalemia.

Tables and Figures

Table 1. Acute End Organ Dysfunction In Hypertensive Emergencies


References Evidence-based medicine requires a critical appraisal of the literature based upon study methodology and number of subjects. Not all references are equally robust. The findings of a large, prospective, random ized, and blinded trial should carry more weight than a case report. To help the reader judge the strength of each reference, pertinent information about the study will be included in bold type following the ref erence, where available. In addition, the most informative references cited in this paper, as determined by the authors, will be noted by an asterisk (*) next to the number of the reference.

  1. * Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure - The JNC 7 Report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560-2572. (Consensus paper)
  2. Schwartz GL. Hypertension. Scientific American Medicine. 2010. Available at: Accessed June 5, 2014.
  3. Levy P. Hypertensive emergencies - on the cutting edge. Paper presented at: 2010 EMCREG-International Web Symposia on Cardiovascular and Neurovascular Emergencies; 2010.
  4. Shayne PH, Pitts SR. Severely increased blood pressure in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(4):513- 529. (Guideline)
  5. * James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311(5):507-520. (Systematic review)
  6. * 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31(10):1925-1938. (Guideline)
  7. McKinnon M, O’Neill JM. Hypertension in the emergency department: treat now, later, or not at all. Emergency Medicine Practice. 2010;12(6):24. (Review)
  8. * Wolf SJ, Lo B, Shih RD, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients in the emergency department with asymptomatic elevated blood pressure. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(1):59-68. (Systematic review)
  9. * Borden WB, Maddox TM, Tang F, et al. Impact of the 2014 expert panel recommendations for management of high blood pressure on contemporary cardiovascular practice: insights from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):2196-2203. (Cohort study; 1,185,253 patients)
  10. Go AS, Bauman MA, Coleman King SM, et al. An effective approach to high blood pressure control: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12):1230-1238. (Advisory)
  11. * Gonzalez Morganti K, Bauhoff S, Blanchard JC, et al. The Evolving Role of Emergency Departments in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2013. (Book)
  12. Backer HD, Decker L, Ackerson L. Reproducibility of increased blood pressure during an emergency department or urgent care visit. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(4):507-512. (Prospective cohort; 407 patients)
  13. Fleming J, Meredith C, Henry J. Detection of hypertension in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2005;22(9):636-640. (Prospective cohort; 126 patients)
  14. Karras DJ, Ufberg JW, Heilpern KL, et al. Elevated blood pressure in urban emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(9):835-843. (Prospective cohort; 1396 patients)
  15. Baumann BM, Abate NL, Cowan RM, et al. Characteristics and referral of emergency department patients with elevated blood pressure. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(9):779-784. (Prospective observational; 991 patients)
  16. Dolatabadi AA, Motamedi M, Hatamabadi H, et al. Prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension in the emergency department. Trauma Mon. 2014;19(1):e7328. (Cross-sectional; 356 patients)
  17. Baumann BM, Abate NL, Cowan RM, et al. Differing prevalence estimates of elevated blood pressure in ED patients using 4 methods of categorization. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(5):561-565. (Prospective observational; 326 patients)
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: awareness and treatment of uncontrolled hypertension among adults--United States, 2003-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:703-709. (Cross-sectional; 22,992 patients)
  19. Adrogue HJ, Madias NE. Sodium and potassium in the pathogenesis of hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(19):1966-1978. (Review)
  20. Dedier J, Stampfer MJ, Hankinson SE, et al. Nonnarcotic analgesic use and the risk of hypertension in US women. Hypertension. 2002;40(5):604-608. (Prospective cohort; 51,630 patients)
  21. Dawson J, Fulton R, McInnes GT, et al. Acetaminophen use and change in blood pressure in a hypertensive population. J Hypertens. 2013;31(7):1485-1490. (Prospective cohort; 2754 patients)
  22. Estruch R, Coca A, Rodicio JL. High blood pressure, alcohol and cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens. 2005;23(1):226-229. (Systematic review)
  23. Levy P, Ye H, Compton S, et al. Subclinical hypertensive heart disease in black patients with elevated blood pressure in an inner-city emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(4):467-474. (Prospective cohort; 161 patients)
  24. Peters R, Beckett N, Fagard R, et al. Increased pulse pressure linked to dementia: further results from the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial - HYVET. J Hypertens. 2013;31(9):1868- 1875. (Randomized control trial; 3845 patients)
  25. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al. Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(18):1291-1297. (Prospective cohort; 6589 patients)
  26. Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb RL Jr, et al. Lower stroke risk with lower blood pressure in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia. Neurology. 2014;82(12):1027-1032. (Prospective cohort; 91 patients)
  27. Huang Y, Cai X, Li Y, et al. Prehypertension and the risk of stroke: a meta-analysis. Neurology. 2014. (Meta-analysis; 762,393 patients)
  28. Reboldi G, Angeli F, de Simone G, et al. Tight versus standard blood pressure control in patients with hypertension with and without cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2014;63(3):475482. (Randomized controlled trial; 1111 patients)
  29. Cienki JJ, DeLuca LA. Agreement between emergency medical services and expert blood pressure measurements. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(1):64-68. (Prospective observational; 200 patients)
  30. Gilboy N, Tanabe T, Travers D, et al. Emergency severity index (ESI): a triage tool for emergency department care, version 4. Implementation handbook 2012 edition. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0014. Rockville, MD. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. November 2011. (Implementation handbook)
  31. Miltner RS, Johnson KD, Deierhoi R. Exploring the frequency of blood pressure documentation in emergency departments. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014;46(2):98-105. (Retrospective chart review; 43,232 patients)
  32. Beevers G, Lip GY, O’Brien E. ABC of hypertension: blood pressure measurement. Part II-conventional sphygmomanometry: technique of auscultatory blood pressure measurement. BMJ. 2001;322(7293):1043-1047. (Review)
  33. O’Brien E. Review: a century of confusion; which bladder for accurate blood pressure measurement? J Hum Hypertens. 1996;10(9):565-572. (Systematic review)
  34. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342. (Randomized controlled trial; 252 patients)
  35. Edwards C, Hiremath S, Gupta A, et al. BpTRUth: do automated blood pressure monitors outperform mercury? J Am Soc Hypertens. 2013;7(6):448-453. (Retrospective chart review; 329 patients)
  36. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial. Fam Pract. 2012;29(4):376-382. (Prospective cohort; 461 patients)
  37. Wong TY, Mitchell P. Hypertensive retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(22):2310-2317. (Systematic review)
  38. Bartha GW, Nugent CA. Routine chest roentgenograms and electrocardiograms. Usefulness in the hypertensive workup. Arch Intern Med. 1978;138(8):1211-1213. (Retrospective cohort; 109 patients)
  39. Antikainen RL, Beckett N, Peters R, et al. Prevalence and covariates of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial. J Hypertens. 2013;31(6):1224-1232. (Randomized control trial; 2993 patients)
  40. Karras DJ, Heilpern KL, Riley LJ, et al. Urine dipstick as a screening test for serum creatinine elevation in emergency department patients with severe hypertension. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(1):27-34. (Prospective cohort; 143 patients)
  41. Hsieh BP, Pham MX, Froelicher VF. Prognostic value of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J. 2005;150(1):161-167. (Retrospective cohort; 19,434 patients)
  42. Mahn JJ, Dubey E, Brody A, et al. Test characteristics of electrocardiography for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy in asymptomatic emergency department patients with hypertension. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(9):996-1002. (Prospective cohort; 161 patients)
  43. Welsh P, Poulter NR, Chang CL, et al. The value of Nterminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in determining antihypertensive benefit: observations from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT). Hypertension. 2014;63(3):507-513. (Prospective cohort; 6549 patients)
  44. Uraizee I, Cheng S, Hung CL, et al. Relation of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide with diastolic function in hypertensive heart disease. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26(10):12341241. (Prospective cohort; 313 patients)
  45. Mallamaci F, Leonardis D, Pizzini P, et al. Procalcitonin and the inflammatory response to salt in essential hypertension: a randomized cross-over clinical trial. J Hypertens. 2013;31(7):1424-1430. (Randomized control trial; 32 patients)
  46. Fukutomi M, Hoshide S, Eguchi K, et al. Low-grade inflammation and ambulatory blood pressure response to antihypertensive treatment: the ALPHABET study. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26(6):784-792. (Randomized control trial; 88 patients)
  47. Daka B, Rosen T, Jansson PA, et al. Low sex hormone-binding globulin is associated with hypertension: a cross-sectional study in a Swedish population. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013;13:30. (Randomized control trial; 2816 patients)
  48. Bohan J, Fullerton L, Oakland B, et al. Hypertension in the ED: a multifaceted intervention to change provider practice. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(7):796-801. (Prospective interventional, chart review; 7 providers)
  49. Tilman K, DeLashaw M, Lowe S, et al. Recognizing asymptomatic elevated blood pressure in ED patients: how good (bad) are we? Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(3):313-317. (Retrospective chart review; 9805 patients)
  50. Tanabe P, Persell SD, Adams JG, et al. Increased blood pressure in the emergency department: pain, anxiety, or undiagnosed hypertension? Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(3):221-229. (Prospective cohort; 189 patients)
  51. Freis ED AL, Armstrong ML, et al. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. JAMA. 1967;202:1028-1034. (Prospective cohort; 523 patients)
  52. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(21):2413-2446. (Guideline)
  53. Wachter RM. Symptomatic hypotension induced by nifedipine in the acute treatment of severe hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(3):556-558. (Case series; 3 patients)
  54. Pitts SR, Adams RP. Emergency department hypertension and regression to the mean. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;31(2):214- 218. (Retrospective cohort; 195 patients)
  55. Preston RA, Baltodano NM, Cienki J, et al. Clinical presentation and management of patients with uncontrolled, severe hypertension: results from a public teaching hospital. J Hum Hypertens. 1999;13(4):249-255. (Retrospective chart review; 142 patients)
  56. Katz JN, Gore JM, Amin A, et al. Practice patterns, outcomes, and end-organ dysfunction for patients with acute severe hypertension: the Studying the Treatment of Acute hyperTension (STAT) registry. Am Heart J. 2009;158(4):599-606. (Prospective cohort; 1588 patients)
  57. Grassi D, O’Flaherty M, Pellizzari M, et al. Hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department: evaluating blood pressure response to rest and to antihypertensive drugs with different profiles. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008;10(9):662- 667. (Randomized open-label cohort; 549 patients)
  58. Kinsella K, Baraff LJ. Initiation of therapy for asymptomatic hypertension in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(6):791-792. (Review)
  59. Shayne P. Against routine initiation of antihypertensive therapy in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(6):792-793. (Review)
  60. Gallagher EJ. Hypertensive urgencies: treating the mercury? Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(4):530-531. (Review)
  61. Shea S, Misra D, Ehrlich MH, et al. Predisposing factors for severe, uncontrolled hypertension in an inner-city minority population. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(11):776-781. (Case control; 207 patients)
  62. Collins K, Gough S, Clancy M. Screening for hypertension in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(4):196-199. (Randomized control trial; 377 patients)
  63. Whelton PK, He J, Appel LJ, et al. Primary prevention of hypertension: clinical and public health advisory from the national high blood pressure education program. JAMA. 2002;288(15):1882-1888. (Consensus paper)
  64. Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S76-S99. (Guideline)
  65. Ziv A, Vogel O, Keret D, et al. Comprehensive Approach to Lower Blood Pressure (CALM-BP): a randomized controlled trial of a multifactorial lifestyle intervention. J Hum Hypertens. 2013;27(10):594-600. (Randomized control trial; 113 patients)
  66. Rodriguez-Leyva D, Weighell W, Edel AL, et al. Potent antihypertensive action of dietary flaxseed in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2013;62(6):1081-1089. (Randomized control trial; 110 patients)
  67. Mucalo I, Jovanovski E, Rahelic D, et al. Effect of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) on arterial stiffness in subjects with type-2 diabetes and concomitant hypertension. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;150(1):148-153. (Randomized control trial; 64 patients)
  68. Racial/ethnic disparities in the awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension - United States, 2003-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(18):351-355. (Cross-sectional; 22,922 patients)
  69. Rader F, Elashoff RM, Niknezhad S, et al. Differential treatment of hypertension by primary care providers and hypertension specialists in a barber-based intervention trial to control hypertension in black men. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(9):1421- 1426. (Randomized control trial; 105 patients)
  70. Meischke H, Fahrenbruch C, Ike B, et al. Feasibility of partnering with emergency medical services to identify people at risk for uncontrolled high blood pressure. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:7. (Survey)
  71. Meischke H, Ike BR, Fahrenbruch C, et al. Hypertension identification via emergency responders: a randomized controlled intervention study. Prev Med. 2013;57(6):914-919. (Randomized control trial; 7106 patients)
  72. * Nwankwo T, Yoon SS, Burt V, et al. Hypertension among adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2013;(133):1-8. (Cross-sectional; 22,992 patients)
  73. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122-1131. (Consensus recommendation)
  74. Svenson JE, Repplinger M. Hypertension in the ED: still an unrecognized problem. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(8):913-917. (Retrospective chart review; 2821 patients)
  75. Chernow SM, Iserson KV, Criss E. Use of the emergency department for hypertension screening: a prospective study. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16(2):180-182. (Prospective observational; 239 patients)
  76. Slater RN, DaCruz DJ, Jarrett LN. Detection of hypertension in accident and emergency departments. Arch Emerg Med. 1987;4(1):7. (Prospective observational; 60 patients)
  77. Dieterle T, Schuurmans MM, Strobel W, et al. Moderate-tosevere blood pressure elevation at ED entry: hypertension or normotension? Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23(4):474-479. (Prospective, observational; 45 patients)
  78. Olivier HE, Jamero D. Implementation of a hypertension clinic using a streamlined treatment algorithm. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012;69(8):664-667. (Review)
  79. Shah T, Aronow WS, Peterson SJ, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and referral of hypertension or prehypertension in an emergency department after an educational program: preliminary results. J Clin Hypertens. 2011;13(6):413-415. (Retrospective chart review)
  80. Navar-Boggan AM, Fanaroff A, Swaminathan A, et al. The impact of a measurement and feedback intervention on blood pressure control in ambulatory cardiology practice. Am Heart J. 2014;167(4):466-471. (Retrospective chart review; 600 patients)
  81. Cienki JJ, Guerrera AD, Rose Steed N, et al. Impact of an electronic medical record system on emergency department discharge instructions for patients with hypertension. Postgrad Med. 2013;125(5):59-66. (Retrospective chart review; 1000 charts)
  82. Alhalaiqa F, Deane KH, Gray R. Hypertensive patients’ experience with adherence therapy for enhancing medication compliance: a qualitative exploration. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(13- 14):2039-2052. (Qualitative; 10 patients)
  83. Wong MC, Liu KQ, Wang HH, et al. Effectiveness of a pharmacist-led drug counseling on enhancing antihypertensive adherence and blood pressure control: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(7):753-761. (Randomized control trial; 274 patients)
  84. Magid DJ, Olson KL, Billups SJ, et al. A pharmacist-led, American Heart Association Heart360 Web-enabled home blood pressure monitoring program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(2):157-163. (Randomized control trial; 348 patients)
  85. Carter BL, Coffey CS, Uribe L, et al. Similar blood pressure values across racial and economic groups: baseline data from a group randomized clinical trial. J Clin Hypertens. 2013;15(6):404-412. (Randomized control trial; 1053 patients)
  86. Chen Z, Ernst ME, Ardery G, et al. Physician-pharmacist co-management and 24-hour blood pressure control. J Clin Hypertens. 2013;15(5):337-343. (Randomized control trial; 198 patients)
  87. Glynn LG, Murphy AW, Smith SM, et al. Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(3). Available at: Accessed June 5, 2014. (Systematic review)
  88. Green BB, Anderson ML, Ralston JD, et al. Blood pressure 1 year after completion of web-based pharmacist care. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(13):1250-1252. (Randomized control trial; 618 patients)
  89. Margolis KL, Asche SE, Bergdall AR, et al. Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(1):46-56. (Randomized control trial; 450 patients)
  90. Svarstad BL, Kotchen JM, Shireman TI, et al. Improving refill adherence and hypertension control in black patients: Wisconsin TEAM trial. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2013;53(5):520-529. (Randomized control trial; 576 patients)
  91. Sen M, Rasjo Wraak G, Ronmark P, et al. Lack of long-term effects from a pedagogical intervention upon blood pressure control--a randomized primary care study. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2013;47(5):289-296. (Randomized control trial; 107 patients)
  92. Ameling JM, Ephraim PL, Bone LR, et al. Adapting hypertension self-management interventions to enhance their sustained effectiveness among urban African Americans. Fam Community Health. 2014;37(2):119-133. (Review)
  93. Asayama K, Thijs L, Brguljan-Hitij J, et al. Risk stratification by self-measured home blood pressure across categories of conventional blood pressure: a participant-level meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014;11(1):e1001591. (Meta-analysis; 5008 patients)
  94. Parati G, Stergiou G, O’Brien E, et al. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2014. (Guideline)
  95. Stergiou GS, Asayama K, Thijs L, et al. Prognosis of whitecoat and masked hypertension: international database of home blood pressure in relation to cardiovascular outcome. Hypertension. 2014;63(4):675-682. (Prospective cohort; 6548 patients)
  96. Ostchega Y, Berman L, Hughes JP, et al. Home blood pressure monitoring and hypertension status among US adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2009-2010. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26(9):1086-1092. (Cross-sectional; 6001 patients)
  97. Petersen LA, Simpson K, Pietz K, et al. Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(10):10421050. (Cluster randomized trial; 125 patients)
  98. Barlas D, Homan CS, Rakowski J, et al. How well do patients obtain short-term follow-up after discharge from the emergency department? Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(5):610-614. (Survey; 325 respondents)
  99. Trembath CR, Hickner JM, Bishop SW. Incidental blood pressure elevations: a MIRNET project. J Fam Pract. 1991;32(4):378-381. (Prospective observational; 174 patients)
  100. Pirotte MJ, Buckley BA, Lerhmann JF, et al. Development of a screening and brief intervention and referral for treatment for ED patients at risk for undiagnosed hypertension: a qualitative study. J Emerg Nurs. 2014;40(1):E1-E9. (Qualitative)
  101. Agrawal Y, Gupta V. High blood pressure ER visits jumped 25 percent in 2006-11. Presented at: American Heart Association’s High Blood Pressure Research 2014 Scientific Sessions; September 9, 2014; San Francisco, CA. (Cross-sectional)
  102. Irvin CB, Wyer PC, Gerson LW, et al. Preventive care in the emergency department, part II: clinical preventive services - an emergency medicine evidence-based review. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(9):1042-1054. (Systematic review)
  103. Tan N, Taylor DM. Feasibility and outcomes of screening for cardiovascular risk factors in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25(2):175-181. (Cross-sectional; 534 patients)
  104. Lewin MR. Asymptomatically elevated blood pressure in the emergency department: a finding deserving of attention by emergency physicians? Keio J Med. 2009;58(1):19-23. (Review)
  105. Frei SP, Burmeister DB, Coil JF. Frequency of serious outcomes in patients with hypertension as a chief complaint in the emergency department. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113(9):664-668. (Retrospective chart review; 149 patients)
  106. Gore JM, Peterson E, Amin A, et al. Predictors of 90-day readmission among patients with acute severe hypertension. The cross-sectional observational Studying the Treatment of Acute hyperTension (STAT) study. Am Heart J. 2010;160(3):521-527. (Retrospective chart review)
  107. Vlcek M, Bur A, Woisetschlager C, et al. Association between hypertensive urgencies and subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens. 2008;26(4):657-662. (Prospective observational cohort; 679 patients)
  108. Gualtierotti R, Zoppi A, Mugellini A, et al. Effect of naproxen and acetaminophen on blood pressure lowering by ramipril, valsartan and aliskiren in hypertensive patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14(14):1875-1884. (Randomized control trial; 135 patients)
  109. Farah R, Makhoul N, Arraf Z, et al. Switching therapy to bedtime for uncontrolled hypertension with a nondipping pattern: a prospective randomized-controlled study. Blood Press Monit. 2013;18(4):227-231. (Randomized control trial; 200 patients)
  110. Fung CS, Wong WC, Wong CK, et al. Home blood pressure monitoring--a trial on the effect of a structured education program. Aust Fam Physician. 2013;42(4):233-237. (Randomized control trial; 240 patients)
Get A Sample Issue Of Emergency Medicine Practice
Enter your email to get your copy today! Plus receive updates on EB Medicine every month.
Please provide a valid email address.