Calculated Decisions | Management of Patients With Thermal Burns
0
TOC Will Appear Here

Emergency Department Management of Patients With Thermal Burns

13,605 views
Below is a free preview. Log in or subscribe for full access. Or, get a free sample article Emergency Department Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in the Nonpregnant Patient:
Please provide a valid email address.
  Table of Contents

Parkland Formula for Burns
Parkland Formula for Burns Calculated Decisions
Access Calculator
Read More

 

Parkland Formula for Burns
 

Introduction

 
The Parkland formula for burns calculates fluid requirements for burn patients in a 24-hour period.
 
 
  • The Parkland formula is a validated and effective approach to initial fluid resuscitation in the acutely burned patient.
  • Overly aggressive fluid resuscitation, termed "fluid creep," is well documented in critical care literature. Factors that may lead to fluid creep include lack of physician observation of endpoints (ie, urine output), increased opioid use, and the emergency nature of goal-directed resuscitation.
  • Patients with inhalational and electrical burns, as well as children and the elderly, may require more or less fluid resuscitation than is predicted by the Parkland formula.

Why and When to Use, and Next Steps 

Why To Use

The Parkland formula has been endorsed by the American Burn Association. It has been shown to appropriately restore intravascular volume and limit the development of hypovolemic shock.

When To Use

  • Use the Parkland formula for patients with acute burns.

Next Steps

Resuscitation endpoints and monitoring:

  • Urine output: 0.5 mL/kg/hr in adults (50-100 cc/hr) and 0.5 to 1.0 mL/kg/hr in children weighing < 30 kg.

  • Heart rate: A heart rate of < 110 bpm in adults usually indicates adequate volume. Narrowed pulse pressure provides an earlier indication of shock than does systolic blood pressure alone.

  • Monitoring blood pressure by arterial catheter is superior to cuff pressures because of the interference of tissue edema. The radial artery is the first choice, followed by the femoral artery.

  • Serum lactate is a strong predictor of mortality, and trends can be utilized to determine hemostatic status; however, it should not be used as an independent predictor of adequate fluid resuscitation.

   

Calculator Review Author 

David Zodda, MD  

Department of Emergency Medicine

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, NJ

Advice

It is important to remember that all resuscitation formulas should only be used as guides. Patients should be assessed frequently, with individual adjustments made to maintain adequate organ perfusion.

Critical Actions

Critically ill burn patients are best cared for at a dedicated burn center, particularly those who have any of the following:

  • Partial-thickness burns to > 10% of total body surface area
  • Any size full-thickness burn
  • Burns to hands or genitals
  • Inhalation injury
  • Serious chemical injury
  • Serious electrical injuries, including lightning injury

Evidence Appraisal

Blumetti et al (2008) conducted a retrospective study of patients resuscitated with the Parkland formula at a single institution over 15 years to determine the accuracy of the formula in guiding resuscitation. Using urine output as a guideline for adequate resuscitation, they found that patients commonly received fluid volumes higher than predicted by the Parkland formula, and concluded that the formula should represent a resuscitation “starting point,” but urine output is the most important parameter to control resuscitation volume.

Cartotto et al (2002) performed a retrospective study, and also found that the Parkland formula underestimated the volume requirements in most adults with burns, especially in those with large full-thickness burns. Thus, the Parkland formula is a validated and effective approach to initial fluid resuscitation in the acutely burned patient (Baxter 1974, Cartotto 2002, Blumetti 2008).

Calculator Creator

Charles Baxter, MD

Read more about Dr. Baxter.

References

Original/Primary Reference

Validation

Other References

Copyright © MDCalc • Reprinted with permission.

Related Calculator

To Read The Companion Article:
To Read The Companion Article:
To Read The Companion Article:
Already purchased this course?
Log in to read.
Purchase a subscription

Price: $449/year

140+ Credits!

Money-back Guarantee
Publication Information
Authors

Juliana Tolles, MD, MHS

Peer Reviewed By

Boyd Burns, DO; Christopher Palmer, MD

Publication Date

February 1, 2018

CME Expiration Date

March 1, 2021

Get Permission

Content You Might Be Interested In

Urgent Care Management of Patients With Thermal Burns

Pediatric Electrical Injuries in the Emergency Department: An Evidence-Based Review (Trauma CME)

Optimizing Emergency Management to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in Pediatric Burn Patients (Trauma CME)

Emergency Department Management of Smoke Inhalation Injury in Adults

Get A Sample Issue Of Emergency Medicine Practice
Enter your email to get your copy today! Plus receive updates on EB Medicine every month.
Please provide a valid email address.