It is Saturday night and your third straight overnight shift. As you step into the trauma bay, your charge nurse approaches. “Doctor, we have a 27-year-old male coming in 5 minutes. He was involved in a high-speed motorcycle accident and EMS says he has quite a bit of facial trauma…” He trails off as you see EMS speeding down the hallway. Your resident looks at you and asks, “How are we going to intubate this patient?”
Your second patient arrives soon after. This patient is clearly inebriated and accompanied by both EMS and security. As the patient is brought closer, you note that he is combative and appears to have extensive facial injuries, with bleeding that you cannot identify as originating from any one location. The patient suddenly becomes minimally responsive, and the EMT repeats the vital signs, revealing a blood pressure of 60/40 mm Hg, heart rate in the 120s, and pulse ox, 88% on room air. You turn to your resident and ask, “What are our initial priorities in management of this patient?”
You are now exhausted and ready for your third cup of coffee when you decide to see your next patient, who was brought in by her friend. The friend states that the patient had been involved in an altercation with another patron at a bar earlier in the night. She was punched in the face several times and has had progressive swelling over the succeeding hours; now her lower face is deformed and she cannot clench her teeth. You wonder if you should begin with plain films of the jaw, a panoramic x-ray, or if you should go straight to CT...
Over the past decades, the incidence of maxillofacial trauma has increased worldwide, due to increasing urbanization and industrialization. The etiology of facial injuries varies among different countries, depending on the socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental factors specific to the area.1
Maxillofacial injuries can be particularly difficult to evaluate, as they can range from simple soft-tissue lacerations to complex facial bone fractures.1 Failure to recognize and adequately address concomitant injuries in a patient suffering multiple trauma may negatively impact overall morbidity. In one study, 9% of patients with significant maxillofacial trauma had coexisting brain injury.2
The primary goal in managing maxillofacial trauma in the emergency department (ED) is recognizing potential complications and managing a difficult airway, if the need arises. It is also fundamental to perform a full secondary survey that includes evaluating for possible nasal bone, orbital, maxillary, and mandibular fracture patterns. Initial assessment of a patient with maxillofacial injuries should also exclude any potential vision-threatening injury. Life-threatening blood loss from isolated maxillofacial injuries is uncommon; however, hypovolemia may result from concomitant injuries. Early assessment of all trauma patients requires consideration of potential cervical spine injuries, particularly in the unconscious or obtunded patient.
This issue of Emergency Medicine Practice provides a systematic review of the literature and makes best-practice recommendations to aid emergency clinicians in the initial management of patients who present with maxillofacial injuries. Currently, the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines are considered the gold standard for initial management of all trauma patients; however, many studies have addressed the shortfall of these guidelines.3 This issue will supplement the ATLS guidelines by providing a more comprehensive discussion of diagnostic and management options for these patients.
A literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE®, with the search terms maxillofacial trauma, craniofacial trauma, mandibular fracture, maxillary fracture, zygoma fracture, cervical spine injury, nasal fracture, and orbital fracture. The reference section of each article was also reviewed for additional articles. Although the literature on maxillofacial injuries is extensive, most of the articles obtained were retrospective, case studies, or review articles. There are currently few prospective studies on maxillofacial injuries in the ED setting.
There are currently no national practice guidelines for patients presenting with maxillofacial injuries. Additionally, there are no Cochrane studies that directly address maxillofacial injuries. A study by Doerr rationalizes the scarcity of randomized controlled trials in maxillofacial trauma as being due to high costs, ethical constraints, subject recruitment, and variability of facial fractures.4
1. “The patient’s injuries seemed isolated to the orbital and nasal region, so I only performed a maxillofacial CT.”
Severe maxillofacial trauma may be associated with head trauma and intracranial pathology. This is especially important in patients who have altered mental status or are unable to give a history. Facial fractures may extend into the base of the skull.
2. “The patient didn’t complain of any neck pain, so I didn’t order a cervical spine CT.”
Even soft-tissue injuries to the maxillofacial region may have associated injuries to the cervical spine. Injuries to the midface are most likely associated with C5-C7 disruption, while injuries to the lower face are likely associated with C1-C4 disruption.79
3. “I didn’t notice any obvious injuries in the mouth, so I didn’t think to check for missing teeth.”
Dental injuries occur frequently with maxillofacial trauma. Mandibular fractures and Le Fort fractures are more likely to have associated dental injuries.80 If a trauma patient appears to have a newly missing tooth, consider aspiration. Signs of a missing tooth include an empty socket, possibly with bleeding, or remnants of a fractured tooth. Consider a radiograph of the soft-tissue neck and chest to assess for aspirated teeth.
4. “Both of the patient’s eyes were swollen, so I couldn’t assess for extraocular movements.”
In an alert patient, make sure to perform a complete neurological examination. If the patient complains of diplopia, consider further imaging. Diplopia should raise suspicion of entrapment from a blowout fracture. CT of the facial bones will demonstrate whether any of the orbital walls or the orbital floor have been fractured. An abnormal neurological examination should also prompt assessment of the patient for intracranial trauma. Remember that ultrasound may be used to assess for extraocular movements in patients unable to open their eyes due to swelling.
5. “The patient’s nose keeps running. I’m not sure why.”
CSF rhinorrhea should be considered if there is persistent nasal discharge. Once confirmed, a CT of the head and facial bones should be ordered to evaluate how the cranium has been violated. A neurosurgical consultation is required.
6. “I didn’t notice any obvious bleeding or injuries inside the patient’s nose.”
Patients who have had blunt trauma to the nasal area are at risk for developing septal hematomas. A missed septal hematoma may lead to septal necrosis, perforation, or abscess and disfigurement. A septal hematoma should be incised, drained, and packed during evaluation.
7. “The patient keeps bleeding from somewhere inside his mouth, but I’m not sure where it’s coming from.”
The tongue has an extensive blood supply, and deep or complex lacerations may cause enough bleeding to obscure the physician’s view while evaluating the mouth. More importantly, persistent bleeding from the tongue could obscure the oropharynx, possibly complicating airway management.
8. “I did my primary survey. The patient’s airway appears intact.”
Once a patient is stabilized initially and appears to have an intact airway, re-evaluate the patient multiple times to ensure that soft-tissue edema or hematomas have not developed to the point of airway compromise. In a patient who is at high risk for developing airway compromise due to third-spacing, intubation may need to be considered early in ED management.
9. “I placed a nasal catheter to stop the patient’s epistaxis, but now his face looks more swollen.”
While attempting to control intractable epistaxis, especially from posterior sources, inflatable nasal packing is usually utilized. However, in naso-orbital-ethmoid complex fractures or midface fractures, overinflated nasal packing may displace fracture fragments, causing more injury.
10. “The parents’ story seems a little off. They must be very upset and emotional because their child is injured.”
With any trauma, it is exceedingly important to be aware of signs that could point to underlying abuse. Consider abuse when the history of trauma is inconsistent with the injuries.
Evidence-based medicine requires a critical appraisal of the literature based upon study methodology and number of subjects. Not all references are equally robust. The findings of a large, prospective, random-ized, and blinded trial should carry more weight than a case report.
To help the reader judge the strength of each reference, pertinent information about the study is included in bold type following the ref-erence, where available. The most informative references cited in this paper, as determined by the authors, are noted by an asterisk (*) next to the number of the reference.
To continue reading, please log in or purchase access.
Welcome back to another episode of EMplify, the podcast corollary to EB Medicine’s Emergency Medicine Practice. This month, we’ll be talking “Maxillofacial Trauma in the Emergency Department.”
This episode’s content was curated by Drs. Devjani Das, MD, RDMS, FACEP, and Lea Salazar, MD. Both of Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Northwell Health-Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY. Don’t miss it!
Links and Resources:
Maxillofacial Trauma: Managing Potentially Dangerous and Disfiguring Complex Injuries - https://www.ebmedicine.net/topics.php?paction=showTopic&topic_id=538
Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine - http://medicine.hofstra.edu/
Northwell Health-Staten Island University - https://www.northwell.edu/find-care/locations/staten-island-university-hospital
Clinical Decision Making in Emergency Medicine - http://www.clinicaldecisionmaking.com/
EMplify Twitter Account - @ebmedicine
Devjani Das, MD, RDMS, FACEP; Lea Salazar, MD
April 1, 2017
April 30, 2020
Upon competion of this article, you should be able to:
Physician CME Information
Date of Original Release: April 1, 2017. Date of most recent review: March 10, 2017. Termination date: April 1, 2020.
Accreditation: EB Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the ACCME.
Credit Designation: EB Medicine designates this enduring material for a maximum of 4 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
ACEP Accreditation: Emergency Medicine Practice is approved by the American College of Emergency Physicians for 48 hours of ACEP Category I credit per annual subscription.
AAFP Accreditation: This Medical Journal activity, Emergency Medicine Practice, has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 48 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians per year. AAFP accreditation begins July 1, 2016. Term of approval is for one year from this date. Each issue is approved for 4 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for one year from the date of each issue. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
AOA Accreditation: Emergency Medicine Practice is eligible for up to 48 American Osteopathic Association Category 2-A or 2-B credit hours per year.
Specialty CME: Included as part of the 4 credits, this CME activity is eligible for 4 Trauma CME credits, subject to your state and institutional approval.
Needs Assessment: The need for this educational activity was determined by a survey of medical staff, including the editorial board of this publication; review of morbidity and mortality data from the CDC, AHA, NCHS, and ACEP; and evaluation of prior activities for emergency physicians.
Target Audience: This enduring material is designed for emergency medicine physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and residents.
Goals: Upon completion of this activity, you should be able to: (1) demonstrate medical decision-making based on the strongest clinical evidence; (2) cost-effectively diagnose and treat the most critical presentations; and (3) describe the most common medicolegal pitfalls for each topic covered.
Discussion of Investigational Information: As part of the journal, faculty may be presenting investigational information about pharmaceutical products that is outside Food and Drug Administration–approved labeling. Information presented as part of this activity is intended solely as continuing medical education and is not intended to promote off-label use of any pharmaceutical product.
Faculty Disclosure: It is the policy of EB Medicine to ensure objectivity, balance, independence, transparency, and scientific rigor in all CME-sponsored educational activities. All faculty participating in the planning or implementation of a sponsored activity are expected to disclose to the audience any relevant financial relationships and to assist in resolving any conflict of interest that may arise from the relationship. In compliance with all ACCME Essentials, Standards, and Guidelines, all faculty for this CME activity were asked to complete a full disclosure statement. The information received is as follows: Dr. Das, Dr. Salazar, Dr. Ali, Dr. Murano, Dr. Mishler, Dr. Toscano, Dr. Jagoda, and their related parties report no significant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) discussed in this educational presentation.
Commercial Support: This issue of Emergency Medicine Practice did not receive any commercial support.
Earning Credit: Two Convenient Methods: (1) Go online to www.ebmedicine.net/CME and click on the title of the article. (2) Mail or fax the CME Answer And Evaluation Form (included with your June and December issues) to EB Medicine.
Hardware/Software Requirements: You will need a Macintosh or PC to access the online archived articles and CME testing.
Additional Policies: For additional policies, including our statement of conflict of interest, source of funding, statement of informed consent, and statement of human and animal rights, visit www.ebmedicine.net/policies.