1. Making decisions based on inadequate studies.
If the films are incomplete or unacceptable, repeat them or order
another test. In the interpretation of the chest radiograph, the first
concern is to assure the adequacy of the film. The entire thorax should
be seen, including the apices, lateral chest walls, entire diaphragm
and both costophrenic angles. Failure to assure adequacy of the film
may lead to significant diagnostic error.
2. Measuring the thoracic width incorrectly.
Thoracic
width is measured at the widest point, i.e., the lung base. Failure to
appreciate this point may lead to errors in assessing the
cardiothoracic ratio and mediastinum:chest width ratio.
3. Not looking closely enough for pneumothorax.
When
evaluating for a possible pneumothorax, films must be reviewed
carefully since small pneumothoraces can easily be missed and overlying
skin folds can simulate pneumothoraces. Look for a deep sulcus or for
subcutaneous air as indirect markers of a pneumothorax.
4. Waiting for unnecessary films before making clinical decisions.
The
CXR gets a relatively low ACR appropriateness rating for adults less
than 40 years of age with acute respiratory symptoms, negative physical
examination, and no other signs, symptoms or risk factors for pulmonary
disease. Overuse of the CXR in this population is a common problem and
may contribute to avoidable delay in clinical management and
disposition decisions.
5. Using chest x-rays to decide whether a patient's pneumonia needs antibiotics.
Chest radiograph cannot, by itself, be used to differentiate between viral and bacterial disease.
6. Getting an x-ray for known asthmatics with typical exacerbations.
In the setting of acute asthma, the chest radiograph is indicated only
when pneumonia or pneumothorax is suspected or the diagnosis of asthma
has not yet been established
7. Not getting an x-ray for COPD exacerbations.
Almost
one-fourth of radiographic abnormalities seen in patients with apparent
exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are not
predictable on the basis of high-risk criteria. Routine chest
radiography should be considered.
8. Looking for ventricular hypertrophy on chest x-ray in uncomplicated hypertension.
The
chest radiograph is often included in the work-up of the hypertensive
patient, presumably to evaluate for the presence of left ventricular
hypertrophy (LVH). However, the CXR is insensitive for the detection of
LVH and is not clearly indicated in uncomplicated hypertension.
Echocardiography is the best modality for the detection of LVH.
9. Ordering an ECHO inappropriately.
Obtaining
an echocardiogram is a class I recommendation for the evaluation of
chest pain in patients with suspected acute myocardial ischemia, when
baseline ECG and laboratory markers are non-diagnostic and when the
study can be obtained during pain or within minutes after its
abatement. ECHO is not indicated for chest pain of apparent noncardiac etiology, nor is ECHO indicated for patients who have ECG changes diagnostic of myocardial ischemia/infarction.
10. Using chest radiography to rule out dissection.
Chest radiographic findings are often abnormal in the presence of
aortic dissection and CXR has a reported sensitivity of 90%. However,
the presence of a normal aorta and mediastinum only decreases the
probability of dissection; it does not exclude it.