Transient Ischemic Attack: An Evidence-Based Update (Stroke CME)
TOC Will Appear Here

Transient Ischemic Attack: An Evidence-Based Update (Stroke CME)

Below is a free preview. Log in or subscribe for full access. Or, get a free sample article Emergency Department Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in the Nonpregnant Patient:
Please provide a valid email address.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
  1. Abstract
  2. Case Presentations
  3. Introduction
  4. Critical Appraisal Of The Literature
  5. History And Definition
  6. Epidemiology
  7. Etiology And Pathophysiology
  8. Differential Diagnosis
  9. Prehospital Care
  10. Emergency Department Evaluation
    1. History And Physical Examination
    2. Risk Stratification
  11. Diagnostic Studies
    1. Laboratory Testing
    2. Cardiac Evaluation
    3. Brain Imaging
    4. Vascular Imaging
    5. Perfusion Imaging
  12. Treatment
    1. Antihypertensive Treatment
    2. Antiplatelet Therapy
      1. Aspirin
      2. Other Antiplatelet Agents And Combinations
    3. Anticoagulation
    4. Endovascular Treatment
    5. Lipid Modification
    6. Risk Factor Control
    7. Thrombolysis
  13. Disposition
  14. Risk Management Pitfalls For Transient Ischemic Attack
  15. Time- and Cost-Effective Strategies
  16. Clinical Pathway For Transient Ischemic Attack
  17. Tables and Figures
    1. Table 1. American Heart Association Classification Of Levels And Classes Of Evidence
    2. Table 2. Etiologic Subtypes Of Transient Ischemic Attack
    3. Table 3. Differential Diagnosis Of Transient Ischemic Attack
    4. Table 4. Stroke Chameleons
    5. Table 5. The ABCD2 Score
    6. Table 6. Imaging-Enhanced Risk Prediction Tools
    7. Table 7. Summary Of Types Of Imaging Used In Stroke Risk Prediction Tools
    8. Table 8. Laboratory Studies In Transient Ischemic Attack
    9. Table 9. Sources Of Cardioembolism
    10. Table 10. Summary Of Carotid Imaging Modalities
    11. Table 11. General Management Considerations For Suspected Transient Ischemic Attack
    12. Table 12. Current, Controversial, And Investigational Strategies In Transient Ischemic Attack
    13. Table 13. Novel Anticoagulants And Stroke Risk, Compared To Warfarin
    14. Table 14. Summary Of Disposition Options
    15. Figure 1. Prior And New Cerebellar Infarct On Computed Tomography And Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    16. Figure 2. Leukoaraiosis On Magnetic Resonance Imaging And Computed Tomography
    17. Figure 3. Transient Ischemic Attack On Magnetic Resonance Images
    18. Figure 4. Coronal Computed Tomographic Angiography Showing Carotid Stenosis
    19. Figure 5. Coronal Computed Tomographic Angiography Showing Severe Stenosis Of The Basilar Artery
  18. References


Transient ischemic attack represents a medical emergency and warns of an impending stroke in roughly one-third of patients who experience it. The risk of stroke is highest in the first 48 hours following a transient ischemic attack, and the initial evaluation in the emergency department is the best opportunity to identify those at highest risk of stroke recurrence. The focus should be on differentiating transient ischemic attack from stroke and common mimics. Accurate diagnosis is achieved by obtaining a history of abrupt onset of negative symptoms of ischemic origin fitting a vascular territory, accompanied by a normal examination and the absence of neuroimaging evidence of infarction. Transient ischemic attacks rarely last longer than 1 hour, and the classic 24-hour time-based definition is no longer relevant. Once the diagnosis has been made, clinical risk criteria may augment imaging findings to identify patients at highest and lowest risk of early recurrence. Early etiologic evaluation, including neurovascular and cardiac investigations, allows for catered secondary prevention strategies. Specialized transient ischemic attack clinics and emergency department observation units are safe and efficient alternatives to hospital admission for many transient ischemic attack patients.

Case Presentations

A 59-year-old obese woman presents to your community hospital ED after experiencing a distinct episode in which her left hand felt “clumsy,” along with a left facial droop and left-sided numbness. She denies experiencing frank weakness and states that the symptoms resolved in less than 10 minutes. She mentions a similar episode 2 weeks ago and is concerned because both her parents and an older sibling experienced significantly disabling ischemic strokes. Her vital signs and point-of-care glucose were within normal limits, and her ECG showed sinus rhythm. Her physical exam, including a detailed neurologic exam, was largely unrevealing, with no facial asymmetry, unilateral weakness, sensory loss, or dysmetria appreciated. A noncontrast cranial CT scan of the brain was remarkable only for nonspecific subcortical and periventricular white matter changes without evidence of acute or old infarction, mass, or hemorrhage. Although she was relieved to learn that she has not had a stroke, she is concerned that this may be a precursor of a more serious event. She does not have a primary care physician and states that she has not seen a physician in several years. She asks whether this was a “mini stroke” and, if yes, what the chances are that she will have a stroke in the future.

An 80-year-old man with a history of diabetes, carotid stenosis status post right carotid endarterectomy, and pacemaker-dependent cardiomyopathy presents after multiple brief episodes of garbled speech over the past week. He states that each episode resolved completely before recurring and that he is presently symptom-free. While in the ED, he experiences a 5-minute episode of right hemiparesis and then, once again, normalizes. His vital signs remain stable, and your physical exam is notable for a high-pitched carotid bruit on the right and a stroke scale of zero. A noncontrast CT scan of the brain shows no evidence of infarction. You have no inhouse neurology, and your carotid duplex lab has closed for the evening. How do you proceed?

A 72-year-old woman with a history of hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease presents shortly after experiencing a 20-minute episode of slurred speech and right facial droop. She denies experiencing similar events in the past, but she does endorse a transient episode of vision loss a week ago, intermittent vertigo, and left-sided weakness last month. On exam, her blood pressure is 178/100 mm Hg, her heart rate is 80 beats per minute and regular, and the ECG shows a sinus rhythm. Her stroke scale is zero, and noncontrast cranial CT scan shows an old small cerebellar infarct. It is Friday evening, and you have no inhouse neurology and no MRI capabilities overnight. The patient attributes her symptoms to stress and states that she has experienced anxiety and palpitations recently. She asks if it is necessary for her to be admitted or whether she can seek follow-up with her primary care physician next week.


A transient ischemic attack (TIA) may not seem significant to patients and providers, but it should always be considered a true medical emergency. Caused by temporary focal central nervous system hypoperfusion, a TIA is often a warning of an impending stroke. Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with TIA are at highest risk of stroke within the next 48 hours,1 and thus, it is critically important for the emergency clinician to recognize this opportunity to initiate primary stroke prevention strategies. Since the 2008 issue of Emergency Medicine Practice on TIA was published, there have been numerous studies focusing on improving risk stratification and early management strategies in TIA. This update will provide the best available evidence on diagnosing and managing TIAs.

For more information on current strategies for management of stroke, refer to the July 2012 issue of Emergency Medicine Practice, “Four Evolving Strategies In The Emergent Treatment Of Acute Ischemic Stroke,” the April 2012 issue of Emergency Medicine Practice, “Carotid And Vertebral Arterial Dissections In The Emergency Department,” and the May 2012 issue of EM Practice Guidelines Update, “Current Guidelines On Atrial Fibrillation In The Emergency Department.”

Critical Appraisal Of The Literature

The American Heart Association / American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) released its current recommendations for the evaluation of TIA in a Scientific Statement published in the journal, Stroke, in 20092 and released guidelines for the prevention of stroke following TIA in 2011,3 also in Stroke. The current recommendations are supported by an increasingly robust body of clinical research. The AHA/ASA classification of recommendations and level of evidence are shown in Table 1.

A literature search was performed in September 2012 using PubMed, The National Guidelines Clearinghouse (, and the Cochrane Library. The search was limited to human studies and reviews published in the English language since 2008 using the MeSH term TIA. The search yielded more than a thousand publications, of which hundreds were reviewed. Most were excluded based on reviewing the title, and those most relevant to emergency medicine were included. Preference was given to studies focusing on the diagnostic evaluation, risk stratification, and management of TIA. Additional articles were included if they were judged to be needed for completeness or historical reference.

There exists heterogeneity in the primary outcome measures in the current body of TIA literature. Most studies focus on recurrent events or disabling stroke, but the timeframe is often variable, with 2, 7, 30, and 90 days being the most commonly reported. Although studies with each of the time points are included in this review, emphasis is placed on 2 and 7 days, as they are most relevant to emergency medicine.

Risk Management Pitfalls For Transient Ischemic Attack

  1. “The patient denied symptoms of a stroke, so I did not consider TIA.”
  2. In TIA, history is often difficult, with vague symptoms that may not be suspected to be of ischemic etiology if they are not meticulously ascertained by an astute provider. Patients may dismiss or even fail to recognize certain symptoms.
  3. “Although the patient reported multiple, brief episodes, she felt normal in the ED, so I sent her home.”
    Stuttering symptoms are of particular concern and warrant aggressive care. Be sure to ask about multiple episodes and take them very seriously, even if the patient is normal at the time of the ED encounter.
  4. “I thought the patient’s neurologic examination was normal.”
    Subtle, persistent neurologic deficits are frequently missed in the ED—in over a quarter of TIA patients in 1 study. Performing a stepwise, thorough, and complete neurologic examination can help reduce the incidence of missed ischemic stroke.
  5. “The patient was too young to be having a TIA.”
    Though TIA and stroke are far more common in the elderly, they can occur in young adult and pediatric patients. Consider arterial dissection, structural heart defects, and hereditary or acquired thrombophilias in these patients.
  6. “The CT scan was normal, so I told him to follow up with neurology in a few weeks.”
    In patients with clinically silent infarctions, CT is falsely negative in at least one-third of cases. Patients receiving only a CT scan in the ED should be seen by a neurologist within 48 hours for additional etiologic testing and complete risk stratification.
  7. “The ECG showed a sinus rhythm, so I didn’t pursue cardioembolic causes further.”
    Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is a common cardioembolic culprit in TIA patients without evidence of large-vessel disease. A single 12-lead ECG is insufficient, and these patients should be considered for prolonged Holter or event monitor recording following discharge.
  8. “I discharged the patient because the neurologist said the ABCD2 score wasn’t high enough to admit.”
    The ABCD2 score is a useful research tool and may serve as an adjunct to available imaging for risk stratification, but it should not be used as a threshold by which to screen patients for hospital admission.
  9. “The symptoms lasted only 4 hours, so I knew it had to be a TIA.”
    The revised AHA/ASA-endorsed definition of TIA has moved away from a time-based definition to a tissue-based definition, wherein the arbitrary timeline of 24 hours no longer applies. In fact, the vast majority of TIAs last < 1 hour, and beyond that, infarction is much more likely.
  10. “The patient was already taking aspirin, so I didn’t think there was anything to add.”
    It is still possible to have a TIA or ischemic stroke while already on antiplatelet therapy, and these patients should be considered for alternative antiplatelet agents such as clopidogrel or aspirin/dipyridamole combination therapy. Additional secondary prevention measures include lipid modification, antihypertensive therapy, selective anticoagulation, and lifestyle modification measures.
  11. “TIA is a diagnosis to be worked up either as an inpatient or an outpatient, but not in the ED.”
    Since the risk of ischemic stroke following a TIA is highest within the first 48 hours, the emergency clinician is often the only provider to evaluate the patient in this narrow window of opportunity. Patients should receive frontloaded care and protocolized ED observation units offer a rapid, safe, and efficient means by which to conduct a complete evaluation.

Tables and Figures

Table 1. American Heart Association Classification Of Levels And Classes Of Evidence


Evidence-based medicine requires a critical appraisal of the literature based upon study methodology and number of subjects. Not all references are equally robust. The findings of a large, prospective, randomized, and blinded trial should carry more weight than a case report.

To help the reader judge the strength of each reference, pertinent information about the study will be included in bold type following the reference, where available. In addition, the most informative references cited in this paper, as determined by the authors, are noted by an asterisk (*) next to the number of the reference.

  1. Johnston SC, Gress DR, Browner WS, et al. Short-term prognosis after emergency department diagnosis of TIA. JAMA. 2000;284(22):2901-2906. (Retrospective cohort; 1797 patients)
  2. * Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, et al. Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2276-2293. (Guideline)
  3. * Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42(1):227-276. (Guideline)
  4. Toole JF. The Willis lecture: transient ischemic attacks, scientific method, and new realities. Stroke. 1991;22(1):99-104. (Review)
  5. Caplan LR. Transient ischemic attack: definition and natural history. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2006;8(4):276-280. (Review)
  6. Albers GW, Caplan LR, Easton JD, et al. Transient ischemic attack--proposal for a new definition. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(21):1713-1716. (Editorial)
  7. Ay H, Koroshetz WJ, Benner T, et al. Transient ischemic attack with infarction: a unique syndrome? Ann Neurol. 2005;57(5):679-686. (Statistical update)
  8. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. World Health Organization; 2004. Accessed June 16, 2012.
  9. Towfighi A, Saver JL. Stroke declines from third to fourth leading cause of death in the United States: historical perspective and challenges ahead. Stroke. 2011;42(8):2351-2355. (Narrative review)
  10. Rothwell PM, Warlow CP. Timing of TIAs preceding stroke: time window for prevention is very short. Neurology. 2005;64(5):817-820. (Retrospective; 2416 patients)
  11. Hackam DG, Kapral MK, Wang JT, et al. Most stroke patients do not get a warning: a population-based cohort study. Neurology. 2009;73(13):1074-1076. (Prospective; 16,409 patients)
  12. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121(7):948-954. (Statistical update)
  13. Edlow JA, Kim S, Pelletier AJ, et al. National study on emergency department visits for transient ischemic attack, 1992-2001. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(6):666-672. (Retrospective population-based survey)
  14. Johnston SC, Fayad PB, Gorelick PB, et al. Prevalence and knowledge of transient ischemic attack among US adults. Neurology. 2003;60(9):1429-1434. (Prospective population-based survey)
  15. Kleindorfer D, Panagos P, Pancioli A, et al. Incidence and short-term prognosis of transient ischemic attack in a population-based study. Stroke. 2005;36(4):720-723. (Retrospective netpopulation-based study)
  16. Morgenstern LB, Smith MA, Lisabeth LD, et al. Excess stroke in Mexican Americans compared with non-Hispanic whites: the brain attack surveillance in Corpus Christi project. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(4):376-383. (Cross- sectional population-based study)
  17. Chandratheva A, Mehta Z, Geraghty OC, et al. Population-based study of risk and predictors of stroke in the first few hours after a TIA. Neurology. 2009;72(22):1941-1947. (Prospective population-based study)
  18. Lisabeth LD, Ireland JK, Risser JM, et al. Stroke risk after transient ischemic attack in a population-based setting. Stroke. 2004;35(8):1842-1846. (Prospective population-based study)
  19. Giles MF, Rothwell PM. Risk of stroke early after transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(12):1063-1072. (Meta-analysis; 10,126 patients)
  20. Lovett JK, Dennis MS, Sandercock PA, et al. Very early risk of stroke after a first transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2003;34(8):e138-140. (Meta-analysis; 7328 patients)
  21. Clark TG, Murphy MF, Rothwell PM. Long-term risks of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death in “low risk” patients with a non-recent transient ischaemic attack. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(5):577-580. (Posthoc analysis; 290 patients)
  22. Calvet D, Touze E, Oppenheim C, et al. DWI lesions and TIA etiology improve the prediction of stroke after TIA. Stroke. 2009;40(1):187-192. (Retrospective; 339 patients)
  23. Lavallée PC, Meseguer E, Abboud H, et al. A transient ischaemic attack clinic with round-the-clock access (SOS-TIA): feasibility and effects. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(11):953-960. (Prospective feasibility study; 1085 patients)
  24. Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Chandratheva A, et al. Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1432-1442. (Prospective; 1278 patients)
  25. Olivot JM, Wolford C, Castle J, et al. Two aces: transient ischemic attack work-up as outpatient assessment of clinical evaluation and safety. Stroke. 2011;42(7):1839-1843. (Prospective; 240 patients)
  26. Stead LG, Bellolio MF, Suravaram S, et al. Evaluation of transient ischemic attack in an emergency department observation unit. Neurocrit Care. 2009;10(2):204-208. (Prospective; 418 patients)
  27. von Weitzel-Mudersbach P, Johnsen SP, Andersen G. Low risk of vascular events following urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack: the Aarhus TIA Study. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18(11):1285-1290. (Prospective; 308 patients)
  28. Dirnagl U, Becker K, Meisel A. Preconditioning and tolerance against cerebral ischaemia: from experimental strategies to clinical use. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):398-412. (Review)
  29. Arsava EM, Bayrlee A, Vangel M, et al. Severity of leukoaraiosis determines clinical phenotype after brain infarction. Neurology. 2011;77(1):55-61. (Retrospective; 153 patients)
  30. Marnane M, Duggan CA, Sheehan OC, et al. Stroke subtype classification to mechanism-specific and undetermined categories by TOAST, A-S-C-O, and causative classification system: direct comparison in the North Dublin population stroke study. Stroke. 2010;41(8):1579-1586. (Prospective; 381 patients)
  31. Purroy F, Montaner J, Molina CA, et al. Patterns and predictors of early risk of recurrence after transient ischemic attack with respect to etiologic subtypes. Stroke. 2007;38(12):3225-3229. (Prospective; 388 patients)
  32. Schulz UG, Rothwell PM. Differences in vascular risk factors between etiological subtypes of ischemic stroke: importance of population-based studies. Stroke. 2003;34(8):2050-2059. (Meta-analysis; 647 patients)
  33. Cucchiara B, Kasner SE. In the clinic. Transient ischemic attack. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(1):11-15. (Review)
  34. Amort M, Fluri F, Weisskopf F, et al. Etiological classifications of transient ischemic attacks: subtype classification by TOAST, CCS and ASCO--a pilot study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33(6):508-516. (Prospective feasibility study; 248 patients)
  35. Pendlebury ST, Giles MF, Rothwell PM. Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke: Diagnosis, Investigation, and Management. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009:55-90. (Textbook)
  36. Redfors P, Jood K, Holmegaard L, et al. Stroke subtype predicts outcome in young and middle-aged stroke sufferers. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;126(5):329-335. (Prospective; 600 patients)
  37. Ferro JM. Cardioembolic stroke: an update. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(3):177-188. (Review)
  38. Stead LG, Gilmore RM, Bellolio MF, et al. Cardioembolic but not other stroke subtypes predict mortality independent of stroke severity at presentation. Stroke Res Treat. 2011;2011:281496. (Retrospective; 500 patients)
  39. Arboix A, Alio J. Cardioembolic stroke: clinical features, specific cardiac disorders and prognosis. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2010;6(3):150-161. (Review)
  40. Amort M, Fluri F, Schafer J, et al. Transient ischemic attack versus transient ischemic attack mimics: frequency, clinical characteristics and outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32(1):57-64. (Prospective; 303 patients)
  41. Schroeder EB, Rosamond WD, Morris DL, et al. Determinants of use of emergency medical services in a population with stroke symptoms: the second Delay in Accessing Stroke Healthcare (DASH II) Study. Stroke. 2000;31 (11):2591-2596. (Prospective; 617 patients)
  42. Bray JE, Bladin C. Success with paramedic diagnosis of stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(5):e398; author reply e399. (Letter to the editor)
  43. Bray JE, Martin J, Cooper G, et al. An interventional study to improve paramedic diagnosis of stroke. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005;9(3):297-302. (Prospective; 61 patients)
  44. Adeoye O, Hornung R, Khatri P, et al. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator use for ischemic stroke in the United States: a doubling of treatment rates over the course of 5 years. Stroke. 2011;42(7):1952-1955. (Retrospective; population-based study)
  45. Prabhakaran S, Silver AJ, Warrior L, et al. Misdiagnosis of transient ischemic attacks in the emergency room. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(6):630-635. (Retrospective; 100 patients)
  46. Kraaijeveld CL, van Gijn J, Schouten HJ, et al. Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of transient ischemic attacks. Stroke. 1984;15(4):723-725. (Prospective; 56 patients)
  47. Tomasello F, Mariani F, Fieschi C, et al. Assessment of inter-observer differences in the Italian multicenter study on reversible cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1982;13(1):32-35. (Prospective; 55 patients)
  48. Castle J, Mlynash M, Lee K, et al. Agreement regarding diagnosis of transient ischemic attack fairly low among stroke-trained neurologists. Stroke. 2010;41(7):1367-1370. (Prospective; 55 patients)
  49. Landi G. Clinical diagnosis of transient ischaemic attacks. Lancet. 1992;339(8790):402-405. (Review)
  50. Schrock JW, Glasenapp M, Victor A, et al. Variables associated with discordance between emergency physician and neurologist diagnoses of transient ischemic attacks in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59 (1):19-26. (Retrospective; 436 patients)
  51. Kerber KA, Brown DL, Lisabeth LD, et al. Stroke among patients with dizziness, vertigo, and imbalance in the emergency department: a population-based study. Stroke. 2006;37(10):2484-2487. (Prospective population-based study; 1666 patients)
  52. Levy DE. How transient are transient ischemic attacks? Neurology. 1988;38(5):674-677. (Retrospective; 1343 patients)
  53. Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Flossmann E, et al. A simple score (ABCD) to identify individuals at high early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2005;366(9479):29-36. (Prospective; 378 patients)
  54. Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):283-292. (Prospective; 2893 and 1916 patients, respectively)
  55. Moreau F, Jeerakathil T, Coutts SB, et al. Patients referred for TIA may still have persisting neurological deficits. Can J Neurol Sci. 2012;39(2):170-173. (Prospective; 78 patients)
  56. Martin-Schild S, Albright KC, Tanksley J, et al. Zero on the NIHSS does not equal the absence of stroke. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(1):42-45. (Retrospective; 20 patients)
  57. Huff JS. Stroke mimics and chameleons. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2002;20(3):583-595. (Review)
  58. Edlow JA, Selim MH. Atypical presentations of acute cerebrovascular syndromes. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(6):550-560. (Review)
  59. Kernan WN, Horwitz RI, Brass LM, et al. A prognostic system for transient ischemia or minor stroke. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(7):552-557. (Prospective; 142 patients)
  60. Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Brass LM, et al. The Stroke Prognosis Instrument II (SPI-II): a clinical prediction instrument for patients with transient ischemia and nondisabling ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(2):456-462. (Retrospective; 19,423 patients)
  61. Giles MF, Rothwell PM. Systematic review and pooled analysis of published and unpublished validations of the ABCD and ABCD2 transient ischemic attack risk scores. Stroke. 2010;41(4):667 -673. (Systematic review and retrospective pooled analysis; 9808 patients)
  62. * Perry JJ, Sharma M, Sivilotti ML, et al. Prospective validation of the ABCD2 score for patients in the emergency department with transient ischemic attack. CMAJ. 2011;183(10):1137-1145. (Prospective; 2056 patients)
  63. Sheehan OC, Merwick A, Kelly LA, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of the ABCD2 score to distinguish transient ischemic attack and minor ischemic stroke from noncerebrovascular events: the North Dublin TIA Study. Stroke. 2009;40(11):3449-3454. (Prospective; 594 patients)
  64. Chandratheva A, Geraghty OC, Luengo-Fernandez R, et al. ABCD2 score predicts severity rather than risk of early recurrent events after transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2010;41(5):851-856. (Prospective; 500 patients)
  65. Ay H, Arsava EM, Johnston SC, et al. Clinical- and imaging-based prediction of stroke risk after transient ischemic attack: the CIP model. Stroke. 2009;40(1):181-186. (Retrospective; 601 patients)
  66. Coutts SB, Eliasziw M, Hill MD, et al. An improved scoring system for identifying patients at high early risk of stroke and functional impairment after an acute transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Int J Stroke. 2008;3(1):3-10. (Prospective; 180 patients)
  67. * Giles MF, Albers GW, Amarenco P, et al. Addition of brain infarction to the ABCD2 score (ABCD2I): a collaborative analysis of unpublished data on 4574 patients. Stroke. 2010;41(9):1907-1913. (Retrospective; 4574 patients)
  68. * Merwick A, Albers GW, Amarenco P, et al. Addition of brain and carotid imaging to the ABCD2 score to identify patients at early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack: a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(11):1060-1069. (Retrospective; 3886 patients)
  69. Engelter ST, Amort M, Jax F, et al. Optimizing the risk estimation after a transient ischaemic attack - the ABCDE+ score. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(1):55-61. (Prospective; 248 patients)
  70. Ay H, Gungor L, Arsava EM, et al. A score to predict early risk of recurrence after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2010;74(2):128-135.
  71. * Asimos AW, Rosamond WD, Johnson AM, et al. Early diffusion-weighted MRI as a negative predictor for disabling stroke after ABCD2 score risk categorization in transient ischemic attack patients. Stroke. 2009;40(10):3252 -3257. (Prospective; 944 patients)
  72. Sorensen AG, Ay H. Transient ischemic attack: definition, diagnosis, and risk stratification. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2011;21(2):303-313. (Review)
  73. Giles MF, Albers GW, Amarenco P, et al. Early stroke risk and ABCD2 score performance in tissue- vs time-defined TIA: a multicenter study. Neurology. 2011;77:1222-1228. (Multicenter retrospective cohort; 4574 patients)
  74. * Coutts SB, Modi J, Patel SK, et al. CT/CT angiography and MRI findings predict recurrent stroke after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: results of the prospective CATCH study. Stroke. 2012;43(4):1013-1017. (Prospective; 510 patients)
  75. Prabhakaran S, Patel SK, Samuels J, et al. Perfusion computed tomography in transient ischemic attack. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(1):85-89. (Retrospective; 65 patients)
  76. Edlow JA. Risk stratification in TIA patients: “It’s the vascular lesion, stupid!” Neurology. 2012;79(10):958-959. (Editorial)
  77. Ay H, Benner T, Arsava EM, et al. A computerized algorithm for etiologic classification of ischemic stroke: the causative classification of stroke system. Stroke. 2007;38(11):2979-2984. (Retrospective; 50 patients)
  78. Goldstein LB, Jones MR, Matchar DB, et al. Improving the reliability of stroke subgroup classification using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. Stroke. 2001;32(5):1091-1098. (Retrospective; 14 patients)
  79. Purroy F, Montaner J, Molina CA, et al. C-reactive protein predicts further ischemic events in transient ischemic attack patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007;115(1):60-66. (Prospective; 146 patients)
  80. Corso G, Bottacchi E, Brusa A, et al. Blood C-reactive protein concentration with ABCD2 is a better prognostic tool than ABCD2 alone. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32(2):97-105. (Prospective; 194 patients)
  81. Cucchiara BL, Messe SR, Sansing L, et al. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and C-reactive protein for risk-stratification of patients with TIA. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2332-2336. (Prospective; 167 patients)
  82. Haapaniemi E, Tatlisumak T. Is D-dimer helpful in evaluating stroke patients? A systematic review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;119(3):141-150. (Systematic review)
  83. Kang DW, Yoo SH, Chun S, et al. Inflammatory and hemostatic biomarkers associated with early recurrent ischemic lesions in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(5):1653-1658. (Prospective; 153 patients)
  84. Welsh P, Barber M, Langhorne P, et al. Associations of inflammatory and haemostatic biomarkers with poor outcome in acute ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(3):247-253. (Prospective; 180 patients)
  85. Maas MB, Furie KL. Molecular biomarkers in stroke diagnosis and prognosis. Biomark Med. 2009;3(4):363-383. (Review)
  86. Montaner J, Perea-Gainza M, Delgado P, et al. Etiologic diagnosis of ischemic stroke subtypes with plasma biomarkers. Stroke. 2008;39(8):2280-2287. (Prospective; 1005 patients)
  87. Montaner J, Mendioroz M, Ribo M, et al. A panel of biomarkers including caspase-3 and D-dimer may differentiate acute stroke from stroke-mimicking conditions in the emergency department. J Intern Med. 2011;270(2):166-174. (Prospective; 1005 patients)
  88. Elkins JS, Sidney S, Gress DR, et al. Electrocardiographic findings predict short-term cardiac morbidity after transient ischemic attack. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(9):1437-1441. (Retrospective; 1327 patients)
  89. Barthélémy JC, Féasson-Gérard S, Garnier P, et al. Automatic cardiac event recorders reveal paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after unexplained strokes or transient ischemic attacks. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2003;8(3):194-199. (Prospective; 60 patients)
  90. Tayal AH, Tian M, Kelly KM, et al. Atrial fibrillation detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry in cryptogenic TIA or stroke. Neurology. 2008;71(21):1696-1701. (Retrospective; 56 patients)
  91. Zhang L, Harrison JK, Goldstein LB. Echocardiography for the detection of cardiac sources of embolism in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21(7):577-582. (Retrospective; 186 patients)
  92. Castilla-Guerra L, Fernández-Moreno Mdel C, Alvarez-Suero J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21(8):745-748. (Retrospective; 203 patients)
  93. Perry JJ, Mansour M, Sharma M, et al. National survey of Canadian neurologists’ current practice for transient ischemic attack and the need for a clinical decision rule. Stroke. 2010;41(5):987-991. (Survey; 650 subjects)
  94. Douglas VC, Johnston CM, Elkins J, et al. Head computed tomography findings predict short-term stroke risk after transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2003;34(12):2894-2898. (Retrospective; 478 patients)
  95. Weisberg LA. Computerized tomographic abnormalities in patients with hemispheric transient ischemic attacks. South Med J. 1986;79(7):804-807. (Prospective; 100 patients)
  96. Turnbull IW, Bannister CM. CT observations on the natural history of asymptomatic cerebral infarction following transient ischaemic attacks. Neurol Res. 1985;7(4):190-193. (Retrospective; 261 patients)
  97. Perrone P, Candelise L, Scotti G, et al. CT evaluation in patients with transient ischemic attack. Correlation between clinical and angiographic findings. Eur Neurol. 1979;18(4):217-221. (Prospective; 50 patients)
  98. Ay H, Oliveira-Filho J, Buonanno FS, et al. ‘Footprints’ of transient ischemic attacks: a diffusion-weighted MRI study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;14(3-4):177-186. (Retrospective; 57 patients)
  99. Ginde AA, Foianini A, Renner DM, et al. Availability and quality of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging equipment in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(8):780-783. (Survey; 260 subjects)
  100. Kidwell CS, Chalela JA, Saver JL, et al. Comparison of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA. 2004;292(15):1823-1830. (Prospective; 200 patients)
  101. Chalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):293-298. (Prospective; 356 patients)
  102. Singer OC, Sitzer M, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, et al. Practical limitations of acute stroke MRI due to patient-related problems. Neurology. 2004;62(10):1848-1849. (Prospective; 141 patients)
  103. Fiebach JB, Schellinger PD, Jansen O, et al. CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in randomized order: diffusion-weighted imaging results in higher accuracy and lower interrater variability in the diagnosis of hyperacute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(9):2206-2210. (Single-blinded randomized controlled trial; 50 patients)
  104. Mullins ME, Schaefer PW, Sorensen AG, et al. CT and conventional and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in acute stroke: study in 691 patients at presentation to the emergency department. Radiology. 2002;224(2):353-360. (Retrospective; 573 patients)
  105. Widjaja E, Manuel D, Hodgson TJ, et al. Imaging findings and referral outcomes of rapid assessment stroke clinics. Clin Radiol. 2005;60(10):1076-1082. (Retrospective; 1320 patients)
  106. Carroll BA. Duplex sonography in patients with hemispheric symptoms. J Ultrasound Med. 1989;8(10):535-540. (Prospective; 154 patients)
  107. Prabhakaran S, Chong JY, Sacco RL. Impact of abnormal diffusion-weighted imaging results on short-term outcome following transient ischemic attack. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(8):1105-1109. (Retrospective; 196 patients)
  108. Siket MS, Edlow JA. Transient ischemic attack: reviewing the evolution of the definition, diagnosis, risk stratification, and management for the emergency physician. Emerg Med Clin NA. 2012;30(3):745-770. (Review)
  109. Buskens E, Nederkoorn PJ, Buijs-Van Der Woude T, et al. Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies. Radiology. 2004;233(1):101-112. (Prospective; 350 patients)
  110. Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke. 2003;34(5):1324-1332. (Systematic review)
  111. Ropper AH, Brown RH. Cerebrovascular diseases. In: Ropper AH, Brown RH. Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology. 8th ed. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2005: 660-746. (Textbook)
  112. Feldmann E, Wilterdink JL, Kosinski A, et al. The Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial. Neurology. 2007;68(24):2099-2106. (Prospective; 407 patients)
  113. Meseguer E, Lavallee PC, Mazighi M, et al. Yield of systematic transcranial Doppler in patients with transient ischemic attack. Ann Neurol. 2010;68(1):9-17. (Prospective; 1823 patients)
  114. Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, et al. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology. 2004;63(3):457-460. (Retrospective; 81 patients)
  115. Klingebiel R, Kentenich M, Bauknecht HC, et al. Comparative evaluation of 64-slice CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in assessing the cervicocranial vasculature. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(4):901-907. (Retrospective; 24 patients)
  116. Mnyusiwalla A, Aviv RI, Symons SP. Radiation dose from multidetector row CT imaging for acute stroke. Neuroradiology. 2009;51(10):635-640. (Prospective; 95 patients)
  117. Mlynash M, Olivot JM, Tong DC, et al. Yield of combined perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in hemispheric TIA. Neurology. 2009;72(13):1127-1133. (Prospective; 43 patients)
  118. Restrepo L, Jacobs MA, Barker PB, et al. Assessment of transient ischemic attack with diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(10):1645-1652. (Retrospective; 22 patients)
  119. Krol AL, Coutts SB, Simon JE, et al. Perfusion MRI abnormalities in speech or motor transient ischemic attack patients. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2487-2489. (Prospective; 69 patients)
  120. Perez A, Restrepo L, Kleinman JT, et al. Patients with diffusion-perfusion mismatch on magnetic resonance imaging 48 hours or more after stroke symptom onset: clinical and imaging features. J Neuroimaging. 2006;16(4):329 -333. (Retrospective; 122 patients)
  121. Olivot JM, Albers GW. Diffusion-perfusion MRI for triaging transient ischemic attack and acute cerebrovascular syndromes. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011;24(1):44-49. (Review)
  122. Asdaghi N, Hameed B, Saini M, et al. Acute perfusion and diffusion abnormalities predict early new MRI lesions 1 week after minor stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2011;42(8):2191-2195. (Prospective; 50 patients)
  123. Wojner-Alexander AW, Garami Z, Chernyshev OY, et al. Heads down: flat positioning improves blood flow velocity in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;64(8):1354-1357. 2013(Prospective; 20 patients)
  124. Singhal AB, Benner T, Roccatagliata L, et al. A pilot study of normobaric oxygen therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2005;36(4):797-802. (Randomized controlled pilot trial; 16 patients)
  125. Roffe C, Ali K, Warusevitane A, et al. The SOS pilot study: an RCT of routine oxygen supplementation early after acute stroke--effect on recovery of neurological function at one week. 2011;6(5):e19113. (Randomized controlled pilot trial; 289 patients)
  126. Hadjiev DI, Mineva PP. Transient ischemic attack may present a target for normobaric hyperoxia treatment. Med Hypotheses. 2010;75(1):128-130. (Review)
  127. Sandset EC, Bath PM, Boysen G, et al. The angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan for treatment of acute stroke (SCAST): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9767):741-750. (Randomized controlled trial; 2029 patients)
  128. * Davis SM, Donnan GA. Clinical practice. Secondary prevention after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(20):1914-1922. (Review)
  129. Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke. 2007;38(5):1655-1711. (Guideline)
  130. * Rothwell PM, Algra A, Amarenco P. Medical treatment in acute and long-term secondary prevention after transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1681-1692. (Review)
  131. Yusuf S, Diener HC, Sacco RL, et al. Telmisartan to prevent recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(12):1225-1237. (Randomized controlled trial; 20,332 patients)
  132. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324(7329):71-86. (Collaborative meta-analyses [systematic overview]; 287 studies, 135,000 patients)
  133. Johnson ES, Lanes SF, Wentworth CE III, et al. A metaregression analysis of the dose-response effect of aspirin on stroke. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(11):1248-1253. (Meta-analysis; 135,000 patients)
  134. Weisman SM, Graham DY. Evaluation of the benefits and risks of low-dose aspirin in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(19):2197-2202. (Meta-analysis; 6300 patients)
  135. He J, Whelton PK, Vu B, et al. Aspirin and risk of hemorrhagic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1998;280(22):1930-1935. (Meta-analysis; 55,462 patients)
  136. Gorelick PB, Richardson D, Kelly M, et al. Aspirin and ticlopidine for prevention of recurrent stroke in black patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289(22):2947-2957. (Randomized controlled trial; 902 patients)
  137. Hass WK, Easton JD, Adams HP Jr, et al. A randomized trial comparing ticlopidine hydrochloride with aspirin for the prevention of stroke in high-risk patients. Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(8):501-507. (Randomized controlled trial; 3069 patients)
  138. Gent M, Blakely JA, Easton JD, et al. The Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (CATS) in thromboembolic stroke. Lancet. 1989;1(8649):1215-1220. (Randomized controlled trial; 1072 patients)
  139. Previtera AM, Pagani R. Agranulocytosis and hepatic toxicity with ticlopidine therapy: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2010;4:269. (Case report)
  140. Sacco RL, Diener HC, Yusuf S, et al. Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(12):1238-1251. (Double-blind 2-by-2 factorial trial; 20,332 patients)
  141. Bhatt DL, Fox KA, Hacke W, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(16):1706-1717. (Randomized controlled trial; 15,603 patients)
  142. Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9431):331-337. (Randomized controlled trial; 7599 patients)
  143. Kennedy J, Hill MD, Ryckborst KJ, et al. Fast Assessment of Stroke and Transient ischaemic attack to prevent Early Recurrence (FASTER): a randomised controlled pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(11):961-969. (Randomized controlled pilot trial; 392 patients)
  144. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):993-1003.
  145. Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):991-999.
  146. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(12):857-867. (Meta-analysis; 28,044 patients)
  147. Connolly S, Pogue J, Hart R, et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the atrial fibrillation clopidogrel trial with irbesartan for prevention of vascular events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9526):1903-1912. (Randomized controlled trial; 6706 patients)
  148. Group EAFTS. Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) study group. Lancet. 1993;342(8882):1255-1262. (Randomized controlled trial; 1007 patients)
  149. Mohr JP, Thompson JL, Lazar RM, et al. A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(20):1444-1451. (Randomized controlled trial; 2206 patients)
  150. Halkes PH, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, et al. Medium intensity oral anticoagulants versus aspirin after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(2):115-124. (Randomized controlled trial; 2739 patients)
  151. Gorter JW. Major bleeding during anticoagulation after cerebral ischemia: patterns and risk factors. Stroke Prevention In Reversible Ischemia Trial (SPIRIT). European Atrial Fibrillation Trial (EAFT) study groups. Neurology. 1999;53(6):1319-1327. (Posthoc analysis; 225 patients)
  152. No authors listed. A randomized trial of anticoagulants versus aspirin after cerebral ischemia of presumed arterial origin. The Stroke Prevention In Reversible Ischemia Trial (SPIRIT) study group. Ann Neurol. 1997;42 (6):857-865. (Randomized controlled trial; 1316 patients)
  153. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139-1151. (Randomized controlled trial; 18,113 patients)
  154. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883-891. (Randomized controlled trial; 14,264 patients)
  155. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981-992. (Randomized controlled trial; 18,201 patients)
  156. Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):806-817. (Randomized controlled trial; 5599 patients)
  157. North American Symptomatic Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(7):445-453. (Randomized controlled trial; 659 patients)
  158. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, et al. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet. 2004;363(9413):915-924. (Pooled analysis; 5893 patients)
  159. Brott TG, Hobson RW II, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):11-23. (Randomized controlled trial; 2502 patients)
  160. Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Bruckmann H, et al. 30-day results from the space trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2006;368 (9543):1239-1247. (Randomized controlled trial; 1200 patients)
  161. Ederle J, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9719):985-997. (Randomized controlled trial; 1713 patients)
  162. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(16):1660-1671. (Randomized controlled trial; 527 patients)
  163. Bonati LH, Dobson J, Algra A, et al. Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1062-1073. (Meta-analysis; 3433 patients)
  164. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A III, et al. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(6):549-559. (Randomized controlled trial; 4731 patients)
  165. Amarenco P, Goldstein LB, Szarek M, et al. Effects of intense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Trial. Stroke. 2007;38(12):3198-3204. (Posthoc analysis; 4731 patients)
  166. Towfighi A, Markovic D, Ovbiagele B. Impact of a healthy lifestyle on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after stroke in the USA. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(2):146-151. (Longitudinal; 649 patients)
  167. Chiuve SE, Rexrode KM, Spiegelman D, et al. Primary prevention of stroke by healthy lifestyle. Circulation. 2008;118(9):947-954. (Prospective; 114,928 patients)
  168. Lee CD, Folsom AR, Blair SN. Physical activity and stroke risk: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2003;34(10):2475-2481. (Meta-analysis)
  169. Nguyen-Huynh MN, Johnston SC. Is hospitalization after TIA cost-effective on the basis of treatment with tPA? Neurology. 2005;65(11):1799-1801. (Cost utility analysis)
  170. Joshi JK, Ouyang B, Prabhakaran S. Should TIA patients be hospitalized or referred to a same-day clinic?: a decision analysis. Neurology. 2011;77(24):2082-2088. (Decision analysis)
  171. Coben JH, Owens PL, Steiner CA, et al. Hospital and demographic influences on the disposition of transient ischemic attack. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(2):171-176. (Retrospective cross-sectional analysis; 34,843 subjects)
  172. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Stroke: diagnosis and initial management of acute stroke and transient ischaemic atack (TIA). NICE Clinical Guideline. 2012. (Guideline)
  173. * Amarenco P, Labreuche J, Lavallee PC. Patients with transient ischemic attack with ABCD2 < 4 can have similar 90-day stroke risk as patients with transient ischemic attack with ABCD2 ≥ 4. Stroke. 2012;43(3):863- 865. (Prospective; 1679 patients)
  174. Molina CA, Selim MM. Hospital admission after transient ischemic attack: unmasking wolves in sheeps’ clothing. Stroke. 2012;43(5):1450-1451. (Editorial)
  175. Ross MA, Compton S, Medado P, et al. An emergency department diagnostic protocol for patients with transient ischemic attack: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(2):109-119. (Randomized controlled trial; 149 patients)
  176. * Nahab F, Leach G, Kingston C, et al. Impact of an emergency department observation unit transient ischemic attack protocol on length of stay and cost. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21(8):673-678. (Retrospective; 142 patients)
  177. * Torres Macho J, Pena Lillo G, Perez Martinez D, et al. Outcomes of atherothrombotic transient ischemic attack and minor stroke in an emergency department: results of an outpatient management program. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(5):510-516. (Prospective; 97 patients)
  178. Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray AM, Rothwell PM. Effect of urgent treatment for transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on disability and hospital costs (EXPRESS Study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(3):235-243. (Prospective population-based sequential comparison)
Already purchased this course?
Log in to read.
Purchase a subscription

Price: $449/year

140+ Credits!

Money-back Guarantee
Publication Information

Matthew S. Siket; Jonathan Edlow

Publication Date

January 2, 2013

Get Permission

Get A Sample Issue Of Emergency Medicine Practice
Enter your email to get your copy today! Plus receive updates on EB Medicine every month.
Please provide a valid email address.