Screening For Domestic Violence In The Pediatric Emergency Department

Screening For Domestic Violence In The Pediatric Emergency Department

Below is a free preview. Log in or subscribe for full access. Or, get a free sample article ED Assessment and Management of Pediatric Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion:
Please provide a valid email address.

*NEW* Quick Search this issue!

Table of Contents
Table of Contents
  1. Abstract
  2. Abbreviations Used In This Article
  3. Critical Appraisal Of The Literature
  4. Epidemiology, Etiology, Pathophysiology
  5. Differential Diagnosis
  6. Prehospital Care
  7. ED Evaluation
    1. What if she says "YES?"
  8. Diagnostic Studies
  9. Treatment
  10. Special Circumstances
    1. Teens And Dating Violence
  11. Controversies And Cutting Edge
    1. Effect Of DV/IPV Mandatory Reporting Laws
    2. Screening With Children In The Room
  12. Disposition
  13. Summary
  14. Key Points
  15. Risk Management
  16. Cost Effective Strategies
  17. Clinical Pathway: DV Screening In The ED
  18. Clinical Pathway: Management of Responses To Screening
  19. Tables and Figures
    1. Table 1: Sample Questions For Domestic Violence Screening
    2. Table 2: Sample Responses For Domestic Violence Screening
    3. Table 3: Stages Of Change In Domestic Violence And Stage Matched Interventions
    4. Table 4: National Resources For Domestic Violence Victims
    5. Table 5: Resources On Domestic Violence For Health Care Providers
  20. References
  21. Appendix A: RADAR


Similar scenarios are commonly encountered by all emergency medicine (EM) physicians. However, physicians are often hesitant to ask about Domestic Violence (DV). In a study by Sugg, physicians reported that exploring domestic violence in the clinical setting was analogous to "opening Pandora's box," citing lack of comfort, fear of offending, powerlessness, loss of control, and time constraints as concerns.1

DV, or intimate partner violence (IPV), is commonly defined as a pattern of coercive behaviors including repeated battering and injury, psychological abuse, sexual assault, progressive isolation, deprivation and intimidation.2-4 Women who are injured as a result of DV/IPV often present to the emergency department. However, the majority of these women are not identified as victims. In one study, 37% of female patients with injuries presenting to the emergency department were injured by their partner, but only 5 to 7% of these battered women were identified by emergency department (ED) staff.In another study, 44% of women murdered by their partner had visited an emergency department within two years of the homicide; over 90% of these women presented to the ED for evaluation of injuries incurred as a result of DV/IPV. Another ED study found the incidence of acute DV/IPV with a current male partner to be 11.7%. The cumulative lifetime prevalence of DV/IPV exposure was 54.2%.The American College of Emergency Physicians encourages emergency personnel to screen patients for domestic violence and appropriately refer those patients who indicate that domestic violence may be a problem in their lives.7

There has been heightened awareness of DV/IPV as a pediatric problem as well. In a recent position paper, the American Academy of Pediatrics stated that "recognizing and intervening in domestic violence may be the single best way to prevent child abuse."Approximately 3.3 to 10 million children witness the abuse of a parent or adult caregiver each year.9-11 Children living in families with domestic violence are more likely than their peers to be victims of abuse; the incidence of child abuse in families experiencing domestic violence ranges between 30 to 60%.9, 12,13 One study found that children of abused mothers were 57 times more likely to have been harmed because of DV/IPV between their parents, compared with children of non-abused mothers.14

Children who live with domestic violence face increased risks of exposure to traumatic events, neglect, direct abuse, and losing one or both of their parents. Several studies have shown that exposure in one's home environment to domestic violence as a child leads to the increased likelihood of adult health issues and risk taking behaviors, such as behavioral and emotional problems, cognitive problems, depression, and risks of violence in adult relationships.9,12,15 Children who are raised in homes with domestic violence are at an increased risk of perpetrating or experiencing violence in adulthood, and are more likely to be victims of child abuse. In addition, a child's exposure to DV/IPV can lead to moderate to severe post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).16

While a physician may be the first non-family member that a victim of domestic violence may turn to for help,current rates of screening for domestic violence are low (8 to 21%). This is particularly true in the pediatric setting, in part because pediatricians may feel they lack training in family violence screening and intervention skills.17 ED staff and EM and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians are in a unique position to recognize DV/IPV and intervene on behalf of the victim and children. However, while physicians may observe patterns of injury, repeated injuries, and the adverse mental outcomes of domestic abuse, they may fail to recognize them as DV/IPV.

Without institutional policies and procedures for detecting and treating victims of DV/IPV, many abused women will remain unidentified and without intervention. Only recently has the health care system become an important site for DV/IPV programs.18 In 1992, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) required that all accredited hospitals implement policies and procedures in their facilities to identify, treat, and refer victims of DV.However, most of these programs focus on screening and identification, and few focus on treatment of victims of DV/IPV.18 In one study, pediatric ED providers supported both DV/IPV resource information and routine screening. 19

Abbreviations Used In This Article

ACEP - American College of Emergency Physicians

DV - Domestic Violence

IPV - Intimate Partner Violence

ED - Emergency Department

EM - Emergency Medicine

EMS - Emergency Medical Service

ISF - Institute For Safe Families

JCAHO - Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

PEM - Pediatric Emergency Medicine

PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

USPSTF - The US Preventative Services Task Force

Critical Appraisal Of The Literature

The literature supporting routine or universal screening of women for DV/IPV is evolving, and questions remain about the ultimate effect on health outcomes at this point.20,21 To date, many professional organizations, government agencies, and advocacy groups have recommended universal screening programs based upon consensus of opinion. The emergency medicine literature contains a number of reports that present data from both single and multi-analyses that explore provider perceptions around IPV, barriers to screening, and various screening protocols.22-25 Screening initiatives have been consistently shown to increase the identification of patients experiencing acute episodes of abuse and seeking treatment. However, sustaining screening programs has proven to be difficult.26 At present, standard protocols for IPV screening and chart prompts for both screening and interventions are supported by evidence from a number of EDs.23 Additionally, ongoing training for health care providers is necessary to initiate and maintain screening.

Moving beyond the general ED that serves adult patients, pediatric EDs have explored their role in DV/IPV screening.27-29 In 1997, a survey of 125 pediatric emergency medicine fellows demonstrated a significant disparity between prior child abuse training (97.6%) when compared to DV training (29.6%).28 Fellows reported much more first hand experience with handling child abuse cases than with DV/IPV cases and only 4.2% of fellows reported having protocols in place for responding to battered women in the pediatric ED. Multiple barriers were identified to screening women for DV, including lack of protocol, lack of formal training, lack of DV/IPV experience, belief that DV/IPV was outside the purview of pediatrics, and a variety of potential attitudinal barriers including frustration with what could be done in response to a positive screen and inadequate time to respond. Seven years later, a survey of 130 pediatric chief residents again demonstrated a continuing disparity between child abuse and DV/IPV training with 60% receiving 11 hours or more of child abuse training in residency and 80% receiving less than four hours of DV/IPV training. The disparity extends to experience with child abuse versus DV cases with 78% of respondants working in programs without a formal evaluation protocol, while nearly all had some experience with child abuse cases.30 On a positive note, 93% of pediatric chief residents who responded to the survey thought pediatricians should screen for DV/IPV in patients' families, although only 20% universally screened. Eighty percent voiced an interest in receiving training in how to effectively screen and intervene for DV/IPV. A qualitative study explored the perspectives of 59 mothers, 21 nurses, and 17 physicians in a pediatric ED on IPV screening and found that mothers viewed DV/IPV as a common problem that warranted routine screening in the pediatric ED.29 The study concluded with the following recommendations about DV/IPV practices in pediatric EDs: 1) Those assigned to screen must demonstrate empathy, warmth, and a helping attitude; 2) The child's medical needs must be addressed first and screening for DV/IPV should be performed in a minimally disruptive manner; 3) A clear and organized process around determining risk to the child from the IPV environment must be maintained, especially when child protective services needs to be involved; and 4) Resources and referrals for women who request them must be available.29

Risk Management

  1. Don't assume your patient is not a victim of domestic violence because "They are from a nice suburban family." Domestic violence crosses all socioeconomic, racial, and geographic boundaries.
  2. Don't assume your patient is not a victim of domestic violence because they are male. Up to fifteen percent of victims are male.
  3. Don't forget to screen all patients at high risk: Pregnant, peripartum, and postpartum women, teens, and patients with difficult to explain or repeated injuries.
  4. When a victim says "yes" to screening, avoid condescending comments such as, "Why don't you just leave?" These comments further decrease the victim's self-confidence. Be empathetic; say something like, "Many women are victims of abuse, but that doesn't make it right."
  5. Don't coerce a victim into immediately leaving the relationship. This may not be safe. It must be the victim's decision. Leaving is a process and most homicides occur at this stage. Steps must be taken to ensure safety for the victim and the victim's children.
  6. Don't forget to screen for concurrent child abuse. Children in homes with domestic violence are at a 6 to 15 times increased risk of being abused.
  7. Don't forget to report child abuse. While domestic violence is not reportable in most states, practitioners are mandated to report child abuse in all 50 states.
  8. Don't forget to give resources if it is safe to take them home. Even if the victim is not ready to leave, make sure he or she at least has a hotline number to call for help.
  9. Don't forget to document. Document that you screened even if the answer was no. Document the details of the violence if it is safe to document in the child's chart. Thoroughly document the extent of the injuries.
  10. Last but not least, don't be afraid to ask. Studies have shown that even though the victim may not report to a physician the first time asked, they do appreciate that the question was asked.

Tables and Figures

Table 1: Sample Questions For Domestic
Violence Screening


Evidence-based medicine requires a critical appraisal of the literature based upon study methodology and number of subjects. Not all references are equally robust. The findings of a large, prospective, randomized, and blinded trial should carry more weight than a case report.

To help the reader judge the strength of each reference, pertinent information about the study, such as the type of study and the number of patients in the study, will be included in bold type following the

reference, where available.

  1. Sugg NK, Inui T. Primary care physicians' response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora's Box. JAMA 1992;267(23):3157-3160. (Interview of 38 physicians)
  2. Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines on Domestic Violence. American Medical Association 1992. (Policy Statement)
  3. Anonymous. Emergency medicine and domestic violence: American College of Emergency Physicians. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1995;25(3): 442-443. (Policy Statement)
  4. Director TD, Linden AJ. Domestic violence: an approach to identification and intervention. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2004;22(4):1117-1132. (Review article)
  5. McLeer, SV, et al. Education is not enough: a systems failure in protecting battered women. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18(6):651-653. (Retrospective)
  6. Abbott J, et al. Domestic violence against women: Incidence and prevalence in an emergency department population. JAMA 1995;273(22):1763-1767. (Prospective, 648 patients)
  7. Domestic Violence, Policy #400286. American College of Emergency Physicians 1999. (Policy Statement)
  8. The role of the pediatrician in recognizing and intervening on behalf of abused women: American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Pediatrics1998;101(6):1091-1092. (Policy Statement)
  9. Anonymous. Children and Domestic Violence: A Bulletin For Professionals. National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information. Department of Health And Human Services 2003. (Policy Statement)
  10. Violence and the Family: Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family. American Psychological Association 1996. (Policy Statement)
  11. Straus M, Gelles R. Physical Violence in American Families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers 1990. (Textbook)
  12. Edelson, J. The overlap between child maltreatment and woman battering. Violence Against Women 1999;5(2):134-154.
  13. Appel A, Holden GW. The co-occurrence of spouse and physical child abuse: A review and appraisal. Journal of Family Psychology 1998;12(4):578-599. (Review)
  14. Parkinson GW, Adams RC, Emerling FG. Maternal domestic violence screening in an office-based pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2001;108(3):E43. (Survey, 553 women)
  15. Felitti, VJ. The relationship of adverse childhood experiences to adult health: Turning gold into lead. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2002;48(4):359-369. (Prospective, long term, 18,000 patients)
  16. Kilpatrick KL, Williams LM. Post-traumatic stress disorder in child witnesses to domestic violence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1997;67(4):639-644.
  17. The Role of the Pediatrician in Recognizing and Intervening on Behalf of Abused Women. American Academy of Pediatrics 1998. (Policy Statement)
  18. Haggerty LA, Goodman LA. Stages of change-based nursing interventions for victims of interpersonal violence. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurse 2003;32(1):68-75. (Commentary)
  19. Bair-Merritt MH, et al. Health care providers' opinions on intimate partner violence resources and screening in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2006;22(3):150-153. (Survey, 151 health care providers)
  20. MacMillan HL, et al. Approaches to screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: a randomized trial. JAMA 2006;296(5):530-536. (Cluster randomized trial, 2461 women)
  21. MacMillan HL, Wathen CN. Violence against women: integrating the evidence into clinical practice. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2003;169(6):570-581. (Commentary)
  22. Larkin GL, et al. Universal screening for intimate partner violence in the emergency department: importance of patient and provider factors. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1999;33(6):669-75. (Retrospective, structured medical chart review of 1,638 visits)
  23. Glass N, Dearwater S, Campbell J. Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments. J Emerg Nurse 2001;27(2):141-149. (Survey, 4641 women)
  24. Hurley KF, et al. Emergency department patients' opinions of screening for intimate partner violence among women. Emerg Med J 2005;22(2):97-98.(Survey, 514 adult ED patients)
  25. Biroscak BJ, et al. Intimate partner violence against women: findings from one state's ED surveillance system. J Emerg Nurse 2006;32(1):12-16. (Medical chart review, 23 EDs, 3111 female assault victims)
  26. Ernst AA, Weiss SJ. Intimate partner violence from the emergency medicine perspective. Women Health 2002;35(2-3):71- 81. (Survey, 306 patients)
  27. Borowsky IW, Ireland M. Parental screening for intimate partner violence by pediatricians and family physicians. Pediatrics 2002;110(3):509-516. (National survey of physicians, 37% response rate)
  28. Wright RJ, Wright RO, Isaac NE. Response to battered mothers in the pediatric emergency department: a call for an interdisciplinary approach to family violence. Pediatrics 1997;99(2):186-192. (Survey, pediatric emergency medicine fellows, 77% response rate)
  29. Dowd MD, et al. Mothers' and health care providers' perspectives on screening for intimate partner violence in a pediatric emergency department. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2002;156(8):794-799. (Focus groups, 59 mothers, 21 nurses, 17 physicians)
  30. Bair-Merritt MH, et al. Pediatric residency training on domestic violence: a national survey. Ambul Pediatr 2004;4(1):24-27. (National survey, pediatric chief residents)
  31. Tjaden TN. Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington (DC): Department of Justice (US); 2000. Publication No. NCJ 181867 2000. (Survey, 16000 men and women)
  32. Costs of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in the United States. Center for disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA 2003. (Data base from FBI crime reports and survey of 16000 men and women)
  33. Intimate Partner Violence: Fact Sheet. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 2005. (Epidemiologic Report)
  34. Tjaden TN. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington (DC):Department of Justice (US); 2000. Publication No. NCJ 181867, 2000b. Publication No. NCJ183781. (Survey 16,000 men and women)
  35. Tjaden P, Theonnes N. Prevalence, Incidence, and consequences of violence against women: findings from the national violence against women survey. 1998;1-16. (Survey 16,000 men and women)
  36. National Institute of Justice: Violence Against Women: Identifying Risk Factors. US Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs 2004. (Secondary analysis, 1569 women, 835 men - followed for 4 years)
  37. Coker AL, et al. Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Arch Fam Med 2000;9(5):451-457. (Survey, 1152 women)
  38. Zorza J. Woman Battering: A Major Cause of Homelessness. Clearinghouse Review 1991;25(4):421. (Survey)
  39. A Status Report on Hunger and Homelessness in American Cities. The United States Conference of Mayors 1999. (Annual 24 city epidemiologic survey)
  40. Gazmararian JA et al. Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions. Matern Child Health J 2000;4(2):79-84. (Review article)
  41. Curry MA. The interrelationships between abuse, substance use, and psychosocial stress during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurse 1998;27(6):692-699. (Prospective survey 1937 women)
  42. Walker L. The Battered Woman. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers 1979. (Textbook)
  43. Saltzman LE, FJ, McMahon PM, Shelley GA. Intimate partner violence surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended data elements, version 1.0. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2002 2002. (CDC panel review/Policy Statement)
  44. Beatty D. Stalking legislation in the United States. In MP Brewster. Stalking: Psychology, risk factors, interventions, and law. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute 2003;2:1-21. (Textbook)
  45. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Research in Brief, National Institute of Justice/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1998; 1-20. (Survey 16,000 men and women)
  46. Siegel RM, et al. Screening for domestic violence in the community pediatric setting. Pediatrics 1999;104(4 Pt 1):874-877. (Survey, 154 women)
  47. Duffy SJ, et al. Mothers with histories of domestic violence in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 1999;103(5 Pt 1):1007-1013. (Survey, 157 women)
  48. Husni ME, Linden JA, Tibbles C. Domestic violence and out of hospital providers: a potential resource to protect battered women. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7(3):243-248. (Retrospective chart review, 1251 charts
  49. Roberts GL, et al. Domestic violence and health professionals. Med J Aust 1993;158(12):861. (Commentary)
  50. Weiss SJ, et al. EMT domestic violence knowledge and the results of an educational intervention. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18(2):168-71. (Prospective educational intervention evaluation, 46 EMT's)
  51. Domestic violence: the role of EMS personnel. Ann Emerg Med 2000;36(2):180. (Review)
  52. National Consensus Guidelines on Identifying and Responding to Domestic Violence Victimization in HealthCare Settings. The Family Violence Prevention Fund 2004. (Policy Statement)
  53. McFarlane J, et al. Assessing for abuse: self-report versus nurse interview. Public Health Nurse 1991;8(4):245-250. (Comparison surveys, 477 women)
  54. Koziol-McLain J, Coates CJ, Lowenstein SR. Predictive validity of a screen for partner violence against women. Am J Prev Med 2001;21(2):93-100. (Prospective cohort, 695 women)
  55. Kimberg L. Addressing intimate partner violence in primary care practice. Medscape Women's Health 2001;6(1):E1. (Review)
  56. Thompson RS, et al. Identification and management of domestic violence: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2000;19(4):253-263. (Group randomized control trial, 5 primary care centers)
  57. Bair-Merritt MH, et al. Screening for intimate partner violence using an audiotape questionnaire: a randomized clinical trial in a pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160(3):311-316. (Randomized clinical trial, 497 women)
  58. Kissinger P, et al. Application of computer-assisted interviews to sexual behavior research. American Journal of Epidemiology 1999;149(10):950-954. (Randomized crossover design, 280 women)
  59. Augustyn M,McAlister Groves B. If we don't ask they aren't going to tell: Screening for Domestic Violence. Contemporary Pediatrics 2005;22(9):43-52. (Review)
  60. Zink T. Should children be in the room when the mother is screened for partner violence?[comment]. Journal of Family Practice 2000;49(2):130-136. (Interviews with Family practitioners, pediatricians and Family Violence experts)
  61. Groves BM, AM, Lee D, Sawires P. Identifying and Responding to Domestic Violence, Consensus Recommendations for Child and Adolescent health. End Abuse, Family Violence Prevention Fund 2002. (Policy Statement)
  62. Zink T, et al. Medical management of intimate partner violence considering the stages of change: precontemplation and contemplation. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(3):231-239.(Retrospective interviews, 32 mothers)
  63. Burman S. Battered Women: Stages of Change and Other Treatment Models that Instigate and Sustain Leaving. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 2003;3(1):83-98.
  64. Brown J. Working toward freedom from violence. The process of change in battered women. Violence Against Women 1997;3(1):5-26. (Review)
  65. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997;12(1):38-48. (Review)
  66. DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO. Self-change and therapy change of smoking behavior: a comparison of processes of change in cessation and maintenance. Addict Behavior 1982;7(2):133-142. (Survey 63 adults)
  67. Rennison C. Intimate Partner Violence 1993-2001. Us Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics 2003. NCJ 197838. (Epidemiologic report)
  68. Silverman JG. et al. Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. JAMA 2001;286(5):572-579. (Survey of 1977 9th and 2186 12thgrade students who participated in the 1997 and 1999 Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Surveys)
  69. Cathy Schoen KD, Collins K, et al. The Commonwealth Fund Survey of the Health of Adolescent Girls. Commonwealth Fund 1997. (Survey, 6748 adolescents)
  70. Physical dating violence among high school students— United States 2003.. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;55(19):532-535. (National survey, 15214 students)
  71. Children Now/Kaiser Permanente Poll. 1995. (Survey)
  72. Rodriguez MA, et al. Mandatory reporting of domestic violence injuries to the police: what do emergency department patients think? JAMA 2001;286(5):580-583. (Survey, 1218 women patients in 12 EDs in two states)
  73. Sachs CJ, et al. A population-based survey assessing support for mandatory domestic violence reporting by health care personnel. Women Health 2002;35(2-3):121-133. (Telephone survey, 845 women in 11 cities)
  74. Hayden SR, Barton ED, Hayden M. Domestic violence in the emergency department: how do women prefer to disclose and discuss the issues? Journal of Emergency Medicine 1997;15(4):447-451. (Survey, 243 women in 2 EDs)
  75. Houry D, Feldhaus KM, Abbott J. Mandatory reporting laws. Ann Emerg Med 2000;35(4):404. (Survey, 577 patients)
  76. Erickson RA, Hart SJ. Domestic violence: legal, practice, and educational issues. Medsurg Nurse 1998;164 142-147. (Survey 310 practitioners)
  77. Family Violence Prevention Fund. Family Violence Prevention Fund 2005. (Policy statement)
  78. Durose M, WHC, Langan PA, Motivans M, Rantala RR, Smith EL. Family Violence Statistics: Including Statistics on Strangers and Acquaintances. U.S. Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics 2005. NCJ 207846. (Epidemiologic report)
  79. Family Violence Prevention Fund: Senate passes violence against women act. 2005. (Legal report)
  80. Wisner CL, et al. Intimate partner violence against women: do victims cost health plans more? J Fam Pract 1999;48(6):439-443. (Computerized cost data analysis for 126 DV victims)
Publication Information

Maria D McColgan; Angelo P Giardino

Publication Date

December 1, 2006

Already purchased this course?
Log in to read.
Purchase a subscription

Price: $449/year

140+ Credits!

Money-back Guarantee
Get A Sample Issue Of Emergency Medicine Practice
Enter your email to get your copy today! Plus receive updates on EB Medicine every month.
Please provide a valid email address.