Emergency clinicians must be aware of current diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for influenza and the resources available to guide management. This comprehensive review outlines the classification of these viruses, their pathophysiology, the identification of high-risk patients, and the importance of influenza vaccination. Seasonal variations of influenza are discussed, as well as the rationale for limiting testing during periods of high prevalence. Differences between strains of influenza are discussed, as well as the challenges in achieving optimal vaccine effectiveness. Recommendations for use of the currently available oral, intranasal, and intravenous antiviral treatments are provided, as well as utilizing shared decision-making with patients regarding risks and benefits of treatment.
A 20-month-old boy presents to the ED with a cough and fever for 3 days. He has no past medical history, and his routine vaccinations are up-to-date. His parents say he has been eating less than usual; however, his urine output is normal, and he has had no vomiting or diarrhea. Vital signs are: temperature, 39.6˚C (103.2°F); heart rate, 156 beats/min; respiratory rate, 32 breaths/ min; and oxygen saturation, 100% on room air. He is well-appearing, although his left tympanic membrane is erythematous and bulging, with apparent middle-ear purulence. You make the diagnosis of otitis media in the setting of a presumed viral upper respiratory infection. While preparing the discharge papers, you consider the many patients you’ve seen during the current flu epidemic and wonder whether treatment for influenza would be appropriate . . .
Your next patient is a 32-year-old man with the same chief complaints: cough and fever. His maximum temperature over the past 5 days was 40˚C (103.9°F). He has been taking over-the-counter cold remedies without relief, and today he is markedly short of breath. The patient has no regular primary care provider and has no significant past medical history. His initial vital signs are: temperature, 39.2˚C (102.5°F); heart rate, 118 beats/min; respiratory rate, 28 breaths/min; blood pressure, 134/78 mm Hg; and oxygen saturation, 88% on room air. On examination, he appears uncomfortable, with notable tachypnea. The oropharynx is clear and the neck supple. Crackles are noted in the right lower lung field, without any wheezing. The abdomen is soft and nontender. The patient is given oxygen via face mask, with an improvement in saturation to 100%. Chest x-ray reveals a right lower lobar pneumonia with a small pleural effusion. You start IV antibiotics and request an inpatient bed, as he is hypoxic with his pneumonia. You wonder whether influenza testing is indicated, and if so, what type of test, and how reliable would it be?
During the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic, approximately one-third of the world’s population was infected and approximately 50 million people died.1 At that time, influenza pandemics were not new occurrences, but their mortality and morbidity had not been well documented and the causative organisms had not been identified. Fifty years later, it was estimated that the 1968 “Hong Kong” influenza pandemic (H3N2) caused between 1 and 4 million deaths worldwide. Despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, mortality from influenza continues to increase, with over 30,000 deaths annually in the United States, partly related to the aging of the population.2 With globalization, the need to contain regional influenza outbreaks has assumed more urgency to prevent an emerging pandemic. The emergency department (ED) plays a key role in disease outbreaks, since containment of a potential epidemic relies on early and rapid identification, treatment, and—in some cases—prophylaxis.
The medical costs and lost wages from influenza are substantial. According to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), influenza epidemics cost $10.4 billion per year in direct medical expenses and an additional $16.3 billion in lost earnings annually in the United States.3,4 An influenza epidemic is responsible for 3.1 million hospitalized days, and 31.4 million outpatient visits annually (during the epidemic), with a total economic burden of $87.1 billion in the United States alone.4
This supplement to Emergency Medicine Practice presents an update to the 2018 review, based on a critical appraisal of the most current literature on influenza. Recent studies on clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment are reviewed, and recommendations on the evaluation and management of patients with suspected symptoms of influenza are provided. 2020 updates are highlighted in blue.
This update also includes an overview addendum on the emerging COVID-19 (novel coronavirus outbreak of 2019-2020), along with resources for up-to-date information on this novel virus outbreak.
PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews resources from 2012 to 2020 were accessed using the keywords: emergency department, epidemic, pandemic, influenza, novel H1N1, and H3N2. The CDC5 and the World Health Organization (WHO)6 websites were accessed. Guidelines from the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP),7 the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA),8 and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)9 were also reviewed. References from the literature were searched to identify additional content.
Although precise data for influenza-related illness and sequelae are difficult to obtain, up to 20% of the United States population has been estimated to be infected with the influenza virus during the winter season.2 Influenza disproportionately affects young children and elderly persons, and influenza deaths have increased substantially in the last 2 decades, in part due to the aging of the population.2 Annual mortality in the United States from influenza typically ranges from 12,000 to 56,000 deaths; 140,000 to 710,000 patients are hospitalized each year; and 9.2 to 35.6 million patients present for treatment.4,10
Morbidity and mortality from influenza can vary depending on a given population’s immunity to previous strains.11 Historically, mortality from seasonal outbreaks disproportionately affects the elderly, with up to 90% of deaths occurring in people aged 65 years and older. In the pandemic of 2009, more significant outbreaks of disease were seen in the younger population, who had no (or weaker) immunity.11,12
2. “The patient had an infiltrate on chest x-ray, so bacterial pneumonia appeared to be the clear diagnosis.”
Numerous secondary complications can stem from a primary influenza infection. When addressing and treating these complications, do not overlook the possibility of a primary influenza infection and the need for medical management. In certain clinical situations, treatment with antiviral medications as well as antibacterial medications may be indicated.
5. “My patient is pregnant and has influenza. The side-effect profile of antiviral medications concerns me, so I feel better treating her with supportive care.”
Pregnancy is a risk factor for a more severe disease course during an influenza infection. Initial CDC epidemiologic data from the last 10 influenza seasons indicate that some of the highest rates of morbidity and mortality are among pregnant women, which confirms the necessity of antivirals in this population.
7. “Flu is everywhere. I don’t have the time to consult the CDC website. I will just give oseltamivir to my patient and be done with it.”
Even in times of epidemic influenza infection, numerous strains can be circulating at a given time within a particular region. In past epidemics, there have been reports of influenza strains resistant to oseltamivir. Thus, without knowing the prevalence of local strains, one might mistakenly choose an antiviral agent that will prove less effective on those strains. Treatment with more than 1 agent may even be indicated in some regions until more formal strain-specific diagnostic testing can be undertaken. Since certain medications are effective against only influenza type A, the local prevalence of any type B influenza should be determined in order to select the appropriate drug therapy.
|Table 2. Online Resources for Evaluation/Management of Influenza|
|CDC||Up-to-date information on influenza||Information for Health Professionals|
|CDC||Weekly flu activity and surveillance||Flu Activity & Surveillance|
|CDC||Influenza infection in pregnancy||Pregnant Women & Influenza (Flu)|
|CDC||Antiviral medication treatment recommendations and susceptibility information||Influenza Antiviral Medications|
|American College of Emergency Physicians||Strategic plan for ED management of outbreaks of novel H1N1 influenza||National Strategic Plan for Emergency Department Management of Outbreaks of Novel H1N1 Influenza|
|National Highway Traffic Safety Administration||Strategic plan for prehospital evaluation and management of an influenza pandemic||EMS Pandemic Influenza Guidelines for Statewide Adoption|
Evidence-based medicine requires a critical appraisal of the literature based upon study methodology and number of subjects. Not all references are equally robust. The findings of a large, prospective, randomized, and blinded trial should carry more weight than a case report.
To help the reader judge the strength of each reference, pertinent information about the study, such as the type of study and the number of patients in the study is included in bold type following the references, where available. In addition, the most informative references cited in this paper, as determined by the author, are highlighted.
Jeff: Welcome back to EMplify, the podcast corollary to EB Medicine’s Emergency Medicine Practice. I’m Jeff Nusbaum, and I’m back with my co-host, Nachi Gupta. This month, we’re talking about a topic that is ripe for review this time of year. We’re talking Influenza: Diagnosis and Management.
Nachi: Very appropriate as the cold is settling in here in NYC and we’re already starting to see more cases of influenza. Remember that as you listen through the episode, the means we’re about to cover one of the CME questions for those of you listening at home with the print issue handy.
Jeff: This month’s issue was authored by Dr. Al Giwa of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Dr. Chinwe Ogedegbe of the Seton Hall School of Medicine, and Dr. Charles Murphy of Metrowest Medical Center.
Nachi: And this issue was peer reviewed by Dr. Michael Abraham of the University of Maryland School of Medicine and by Dr. Dan Egan, Vice Chair of Education of the Department of Emergency Medicine at Columbia University.
Jeff: The information contained in this article comes from articles found on pubmed, the cochrane database, center for disease control, and the world health organization. I’d say that’s a pretty reputable group of sources. Additionally, guidelines were reviewed from the american college of emergency physicians, infectious disease society of america, and the american academy of pediatrics.
Nachi: Some brief history here to get us started -- did you know that in 1918/1919, during the influenza pandemic, about one third of the world’s population was infected with influenza?
Jeff: That’s wild. How do they even know that?
Nachi: Not sure, but also worth noting -- an estimated 50 million people died during that pandemic.
Jeff: Clearly a deadly disease. Sadly, that wasn’t the last major outbreak… fifty years later the 1968 hong kong influenza pandemic, H3N2, took between 1 and 4 million lives.
Nachi: And just last year we saw the 2017-2018 influenza epidemic with record-breaking ED visits. This was the deadliest season since 1976 with at least 80,000 deaths.
Jeff: The reason for this is multifactorial. The combination of particularly mutagenic strains causing low vaccine effectiveness, along with decreased production of IV fluids and antiviral medication because of the hurricane, all played a role in last winter’s disastrous epidemic.
Nachi: Overall we’re looking at a rise in influenza related deaths with over 30,000 deaths annually in the US attributed to influenza in recent years. The ED plays a key role in outbreaks, since containment relies on early and rapid identification and treatment.
Jeff: In addition to the mortality you just cited, influenza also causes a tremendous strain on society. The CDC estimates that epidemics cost 10 billion dollars per year. They also estimate that an epidemic is responsible for 3 million hospitalized days and 31 million outpatient visits each year.
Nachi: It is thought that up to 20% of the US population has been infected with influenza in the winter months, disproportionately hitting the young and elderly. Deaths from influenza have been increasing over the last 20 years, likely in part due to a growing elderly population.
Jeff: And naturally, the deaths that we see from influenza also disproportionately affect the elderly, with up to 90% occurring in those 65 or older.
Nachi: Though most of our listeners probably know the difference between an influenza epidemic and pandemic, let’s review it anyway. When the number of cases of influenza is higher than what would be expected in a region, an epidemic is declared. When the occurrence of disease is on a worldwide spectrum, the term pandemic is used.
Jeff: I think that’s enough epidemiology for now. Let’s get started with the basics of the influenza virus. Influenza is spread primarily through direct person-to-person contact via expelled respiratory secretions. It is most active in the winter months, but can be seen year-round.
Nachi: The influenza virus is a spherical RNA-based virus of the orthomyxoviridae family. The RNA core is associated with a nucleoprotein antigen. Variations of this antigen have led to the the 3 primary subgroups -- influenza A, B, and C, with influenza A being the most common.
Jeff: Influenza B is less frequent, but is more frequently associated with epidemics. And Influenza C is the form least likely to infect humans -- it is also milder than both influenza A or B.
Nachi: But back to Influenza A - it can be further classified based on its transmembrane or surface proteins, hemagglutinin and neuraminidase - or H and N for short. There are actually 16 different H subtypes and 9 different N subtypes, but only H1, H2, H3, and N1 and N2 have caused epidemic disease.
Jeff: Two terms worth learning here are antigen drift and anitgen shift. Antigen drift refers to small point mutations to the viral genes that code for H and N. Antigen shift is a much more radical change, with reassortment of viral genes. When cells are infected by 2 or more strains, a new strain can emerge after genetic reassortment.
Nachi: With antigen shift, some immunity may be maintained within a population infected by a similar subtype previously. With antigen drift, there is loss of immunity from prior infection.
Jeff: The appearance of new strains of influenza typically involves an animal host, like pigs, horses, or birds. This is why you might be hear a strain called “swine flu”, “equine flu”, or “avian flu”. Close proximity with these animals facilitates co-infection and genetic reassortment.
Nachi: I think that’s enough basic biology for now, let’s move on to pathophysiology. When inhaled, the influenza virus initially infects the epithelium of the upper respiratory tract and alveolar cells of the lower respiratory tract. Viral replication occurs within 4 to 6 hours. Incubation is 18 to 72 hours. Viral shedding is usually complete roughly 7 days after infection, but can be longer in children and immunocompromised patients.
Jeff: As part of the infectious process and response, there can be significant changes to the respiratory tract with inflammation and epithelial cell necrosis. This can lead to viral pneumonia, and occasionally secondary bacterial pneumonia.
Nachi: The secondary bacterial pathogens that are most common include Staph aureus, Strep pneumoniae, and H influenzae.
Jeff: Despite anything you may read on the internet, vaccines work and luckily influenza happens to be a pathogen which we can vaccinate against. As such, there are 3 methods approved by the FDA for producing influenza vaccines -- egg-based, cell-based, or recombinant influenza vaccine. Once the season’s most likely strains have been determined, the virus is introduced into the medium and allowed to replicate. The antigen is then purified and used to make an injection or nasal spray.
Nachi: It isn’t easy to create vaccines for all strains. H3N2, for example, is particularly virulent, volatile, and mutagenic, which leads to poor prophylaxis against this particular subgroup.
Jeff: In fact, a meta-analysis on vaccine effectiveness from 2004-2015 found that the pooled effectiveness against influenza B was 54%, against the H1N1 pandemic in 2009 was 61%, and against the H3N2 virus was 33%. Not surprisingly, H3N2 dominant seasons are currently associated with the highest rates of influenza cases, hospitalizations, and death.
Nachi: Those are overall some low percentages. So should we still be getting vaccinated? The answer is certainly a resounding YES.. Despite poor protection from certain strains, vaccine effectiveness is still around 50% and prevents severe morbidity and mortality in those patients.
Jeff: That’s right. The 2017-2018 vaccine was only 40% effective, but this still translates to 40% less severe cases and a subsequent decrease in hospitalizations and death.
Nachi: But before we get into actual hospitalization, treatment, and preventing death, let’s talk about the differential. We’re not just focusing on influenza here, but any influenza like illness, since they can be hard to distinguish. The CDC defines “influenza-like illness” as a temperature > 100 F, plus cough or sore throat, in the absence of a known cause other than influenza.
Jeff: Therefore, influenza should really be considered on the differential of any patient who presents to the ED with a fever and URI symptoms. The differential when considering influenza might also include mycoplasma pneumoniae, strep pneumoniae, adenovirus, RSV, rhinovirus, parainfluenza virus, legionella, and community acquired MRSA.
Nachi: With the differential in mind, let’s move on to prehospital care. For the prehospital setting, there isn’t much surprising here. Stabilize and manage the respiratory status with all of your standard tools - oxygen for those with mild hypoxia and advanced airway maneuvers for those with respiratory distess.
Jeff: Of note, EMS providers should use face masks themselves and place them on patients as well. As community paramedicine and mobile integrated health becomes more common, this is one potential area where EMS can potentially keep patients at home or help them seek treatment in alternate destinations to avoid subjecting crowded ED’s to the highly contagious influenza virus.
Nachi: It’s also worth noting, that most communities have strategic plans in the event of a major influenza outbreak. Local, state, and federal protocols have been designed for effective care delivery.
Jeff: Alright, so now that the EMS crew, wearing proper PPE of course, has delivered the patient, who is also wearing a mask, to the ED, we can begin our ED H&P. Don’t forget that patients present with a range of symptoms that vary by age. A typical history is 2-5 days of fever, nasal congestion, sore throat, and myalgias. You might see tachycardia, cough, dyspnea, and chills too.
Nachi: Van Wormer et al conducted a prospective analysis of subjective symptoms to determine correlation with lab confirmed influenza. They found the most common symptoms were cough in 92%, fatigue in 91%, and nasal congestion in 84%, whereas sneezing was actually a negative predictor for influenza.
Jeff: Sneezing, really? Can’t wait to get the Press-Gany results from the sneezing patient I discharge without testing for influenza based on their aggressive sneezes!
Nachi: Aggressive sneezes…? I can’t wait to see your scale for that.
Jeff: Hopefully I’ll have it in next month’s annals. In all seriousness, I’m not doing away with flu swabs just yet. In another retrospective study, Monto et al found that the best multivariate predictors were cough and fever with a positive predictive value of 79%.
Nachi: Yet another study in children found that the predominant symptoms were fever in 95%, cough in 77%, and rhinitis in 78%. This study also suggested that the range of fever was higher in children and that GI symptoms like vomiting and diarrhea were more common in children than adults.
Jeff: Aside from symptomatology, there are quite a few diagnostic tests to consider including viral culture, immunofluoresence, rt-pcr, and rapid antigen testing. The reliability of testing varies greatly depending on the type of test, quality of the sample, and the lab. During a true epidemic, formal testing might not be indicated as the decision to treat is based on treatment criteria like age, comorbidities, and severity of illness.
Nachi: We’ll get to treatment in a few minutes, but diving a bit deeper into testing - there are 3 major categories of tests. The first detects influenza A only. The second detects either A or B, but cannot distinguish between them; and the third detects both influenza A and B and is subtype specific. The majority of rapid testing kits will distinguish between influenza A and B, but not all can distinguish between them. Fluorescent antibody testing by DFA is relatively rapid and yields results within 2 to 4 hours.
Jeff: Viral culture and RT-PCR remain the gold standard, but both require more time and money, as well as a specialized lab. As a result, rapid testing modalities are recommended. Multiple studies have shown significant benefit to the usefulness of positive results on rapid testing. It’s safe to say that at a minimum, rapid testing helps decrease delays in treatment and management.
Nachi: Looking a bit further into the testing characteristics, don’t forget that the positive predictive value of testing is affected by the prevalence of influenza. In periods of low influenza activity (as in the summer), a rapid test will have low PPV and high NPV. The test is more likely to yield false positive results -- up to 50% according to one study when prevalence is below 5%.
Jeff: And conversely, in periods of high influenza activity, a rapid test will have higher PPV and lower NPV, and it is more likely to produce a false negative result.
Nachi: In one prospective study of patients who presented with influenza-like illness during peak season, rapid testing was found to be no better than clinical judgement. During these times, it’s probably better to reserve testing for extremely ill patients in whom diagnostic closure is particularly important. And since the quality of the specimen remains important, empiric treatment of critically ill patients should still be considered.
Jeff: Which is a perfect segway into our next topic - treatment, which is certainly the most interesting section of this article. To start off -- for mild to moderate disease and no underlying high risk conditions, supportive therapy is usually sufficient.
Nachi: Antiviral therapy is reserved for those with a predicted severe disease course or with high risk conditions like long-standing pulmonary disease, pregnancy, immunocompromise, or even just being elderly.
Jeff: Note to self, avoid being elderly.
Nachi: Good luck with that. Anyway, early treatment with antivirals has been shown to reduce influenza-related complications in both children and adults.
Jeff: Once you’ve decided to treat the patient, there are two primary classes of antivirals -- adamantane derivatives and neuraminidase inhibitors. Oh and then there is a new single dose oral antiviral that was just approved by the FDA… baloxavir marboxil (or xofluza), which is in a class of its own -- a polymerase endonuclease inhibitor.
Nachi: The oldest class, the adamantane derivatives, includes amantadine and rimantadine. Then the newer class of neuraminidase inhibitors includes oseltamavir (which is taken by mouth), zanamavir (which is inhaled), and peramivir (which is administered by IV).
Jeff: Oseltamavir is currently approved for patients of all ages. A 2015 meta analysis showed that the intention-to-treat infected population had a shorter time to alleviation of all symptoms from 123 hours to 98 hours. That’s over a day less of symptoms, not bad! There were also fewer lower respiratory tract complications requiring antibiotics and fewer admissions for any cause. Really, not bad!
Nachi: Zanamavir is approved for patients 7 and older -- or for children 5 or older for disease prevention. Zanamavir has been associated with possible bronchospasm and is contraindicated in patients with reactive airway disease.
Jeff: Peramivir, the newest drug in this class, is given as a single IV dose for patients with uncomplicated influenza who have been sick for 2 days or less. Peramavir is approved for patients 2 or older. This is a particularly great choice for a vomiting patient.
Nachi: And as you mentioned before, just last month, the FDA approved baloxavir, a single dose antiviral. It’s effective for influenza type A or B. Note that safety and efficacy have not been established for patients less than 12 years old, weighing less than 40 kg, or pregnant or lactating patients.
Jeff: Unfortunately, there has been some pretty notable antiviral resistance in the recent past, moreso with the adamantane class, but recently also with the neuraminidase inhibitors. In 2007-2008, an oseltamivir-resistant H1N1 strain emerged globally. Luckily, cross-resistance between baloxavir and the adamantanes or neuraminidase inhibitors isn’t expected, as they target different viral proteins, so this may be an answer this year, and in the future.
Nachi: Let’s talk chemoprophylaxis for influenza.. Chemoprophylaxis with oseltamavir or zanamavir can be considered for patients who are at high risk for complications and were exposed to influenza in the first 2 weeks following vaccination, patients who are at high risk for complications and cannot receive the vaccination, and those who are immunocompromised.
Jeff: Chemoprophylaxis is also recommended for pregnant women. For postexposure prophylaxis for pregnant women, the current recommendation is to administer oseltamivir.
Nachi: We should also discuss the efficacy of treatment with antivirals. This has been a hotly debated topic, especially with regards to cost versus benefit… In a meta-analysis, using time to alleviation of symptoms as the primary endpoint, oseltamavir resulted in an efficacy of 73% (with a wide 95% CI from 33% to 89%). And this was with dose of 150mg/day in a symptomatic influenza patient.
Jeff: Similarly zanamavir given at 10mg/day was 62% effective, but again with a wide 95% CI from 15% to 83%. And, of note, other studies have looked into peramivir, but have found no significant benefits other than the route of delivery.
Nachi: In another 2014 study by Muthuri et al., neuraminidase inhibitors were associated with a reduction in mortality -- adjusted OR = 0.81 (with a 95% CI 0.70 to 0.93). Also when comparing late treatment with early treatment (that is, within 2 days of symptom onset), there was a reduction in mortality risk with adjusted OR 0.48 (95%CI 0.41-0.56). These associations with reduction in mortality risk were less pronounced and less significant in children.
Jeff: Mortality benefit, not bad! They further found an increase in mortality hazard ratio with each day’s delay in initiation of treatment up to 5 days, when compared to treatment initiated within 2 days.
Nachi: But back to the children for a second -- another review of neuraminidase inhibitors in children < 12 years old found duration of clinical symptoms was reduced by 36 hours among previously healthy children taking oseltamivir and 30 hours by children taking zanamivir.
Jeff: I think that’s worth summarizing - According to this month’s author’s review of the best current evidence, use of neuraminidase inhibitors is recommended, especially if started within 2 days, for elderly patients and those with comorbidities.
Nachi: Seems like there is decent data to support that conclusion. But let’s not forget that these medications all have side effects.
Jeff: These drugs actually tend to be well tolerated.The most frequently noted side effect of oseltamavir is nausea and vomiting, while zanamavir is associated with diarrhea.
Nachi: Amazing. Let’s talk disposition for your influenza patient.
Jeff: Disposition will depend on many clinical factors, like age, respiratory status, oxygen saturation, comorbid conditions, and reliability of follow up care. Admission might be needed not only to manage the viral infection, but also expected complications.
Nachi: If you’re discharging a patient, be sure to engage in shared decision making regarding risks and benefits of available treatments. Ensure outpatient follow up and discuss return to er precautions.
Jeff: Also, the CDC recommends that these patients stay home for at least 24 hours after their fever has broken.
Nachi: With that -- Let’s summarize the key points and clinical pearls from this month’s issue
Jeff: So that wraps up episode 23 - Influenza: Diagnosis and Management in the Emergency Department.
Nachi: Additional materials are available on our website for Emergency Medicine Practice subscribers. For our subscribers: be sure to go online to get your CME credit for this issue, which includes 3 pharmacology CME credits.
Jeff: Also, for our NP and PA listeners, we have a special offer this month: You can get a full year of access to Emergency Medicine Practice for just $199--including lots of pharmacology, stroke, and trauma CME--and so much more! To get this special deal, go to www.ebmedicine.net/APP.
Nachi: If you’re not a subscriber, consider joining today. You can find out more at www.ebmedicine.net/subscribe. Subscribers get in-depth articles on hundreds of emergency medicine topics, concise summaries of the articles, calculators and risk scores, and CME credits. You’ll also get enhanced access to the podcast, including the images and tables mentioned. You can find everything you need to know at ebmedicine.net/subscribe.
Jeff: And the address for this month’s credit is ebmedicine.net/E1218. As always, the you heard throughout the episode corresponds to the answers to the CME questions. Lastly, be sure to find us on iTunes and rate us or leave comments there. You can also email us directly at firstname.lastname@example.org with any comments or suggestions. Talk to you next month!
World Health Organization. 2009 influenza A pandemic statement. Accessed November 10, 2018. (WHO website)
Peltola V, Ziegler T, Ruuskanen O. Influenza A and B virus infections in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(3):299-305. (Retrospective study; 15,420 patients)
Lim WS. Pandemic flu: clinical management of patients with an influenza-like illness during an influenza pandemic. Tho-rax. 2007;62(suppl1):1-46. (Clinical practice guidelines-UK)
Uyeki TM. Influenza diagnosis and treatment in children: a review of studies on clinically useful tests and antiviral treatment for influenza. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22(2):164-177. (Systematic review)
Stein J, Louie J, Flanders S, et al. Performance characteristics of clinical diagnosis, a clinical decision rule, and a rapid influenza test in the detection of influenza infection in a community sample of adults. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(5):412-419. (Prospective study; 258 patients)
Lee J, Park JH, Jwa H, et al. Comparison of efficacy of intravenous peramivir and oral oseltamivir for the treatment of influenza: systematic review and meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J. 2017;58(4):778-785. (Systematic review; 1676 patients)
Jefferson T, Demicheli V, Rivetti D, et al. Antivirals for influenza in healthy adults: systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9507):303-313. (Systematic review; 51 RCTs)
Jefferson T, Demicheli V, Di Pietrantonj C, et al. Amantadine and rimantadine for influenza A in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD001169. (Cochrane review; 20 prophylaxis trials, 13 treatment trials)
Muthuri SG, Venkatesan S, Myles PR, et al. Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in reducing mortality in patients admitted to hospital with influenza A H1N1pdm09 virus infection: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(5):395-404. (Meta-analysis of data from 2009-2010 pandemic; 78 studies, 29,234 patients)
Drs. Gupta and Nusbaum are practicing emergency physicians. Join Jeff, a former firefighter, and Nachi, a former mathematician, as they take you through the December 2018 issue of Emergency Medicine Practice: Influenza in the Emergency Department: 2020 Update (Pharmacology CME)
Get quick-hit summaries of hot topics in emergency medicine. EMplify summarizes evidence-based reviews in a monthly podcast. Highlights of the latest research published in EB Medicine's peer-reviewed journals educate and arm you for life in the ED.
AL Giwa MD, MBA, FACEP, FAAEM; Chinwe Ogedegbe, MD, MPH, FACEP; Charles G. Murphy, MD
Michael K. Abraham, MD; Daniel J. Egan, MD
February 15, 2020
March 15, 2023
4 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™, 4 ACEP Category I Credits, 4 AAFP Prescribed Credits, 4 AOA Category 2-A or 2-B Credits. Specialty CME Credits: Included as part of the 4 credits, this CME activity is eligible for 2 Pharmacology CME credits
Date of Original Release:December 1, 2018. Date of most recent review: February 15, 2020. Termination date: February 15, 2023.
Accreditation: EB Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the ACCME.
Credit Designation: EB Medicine designates this enduring material for a maximum of 4 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
ACEP Accreditation: Emergency Medicine Practice is approved by the American College of Emergency Physicians for 48 hours of ACEP Category I credit per annual subscription.
AAFP Accreditation: This Enduring Material activity, Emergency Medicine Practice, has been reviewed and is acceptable for credit by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Term of approval begins 07/01/2019. Term of approval is for one year from this date. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Approved for 4 AAFP Prescribed credits.
AOA Accreditation: Emergency Medicine Practice is eligible for up to 48 American Osteopathic Association Category 2-A or 2-B credit hours per year.
Specialty CME: Included as part of the 4 credits, this CME activity is eligible for 2 Pharmacology CME credits, subject to your state and institutional approval.
Needs Assessment: The need for this educational activity was determined by a survey of medical staff, including the editorial board of this publication; review of morbidity and mortality data from the CDC, AHA, NCHS, and ACEP; and evaluation of prior activities for emergency physicians.
Target Audience: This enduring material is designed for emergency medicine physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and residents.
Goals: Upon completion of this activity, you should be able to: (1) demonstrate medical decision-making based on the strongest clinical evidence; (2) cost-effectively diagnose and treat the most critical presentations; and (3) describe the most common medicolegal pitfalls for each topic covered.
Discussion of Investigational Information: As part of the journal, faculty may be presenting investigational information about pharmaceutical products that is outside Food and Drug Administration–approved labeling. Information presented as part of this activity is intended solely as continuing medical education and is not intended to promote off-label use of any pharmaceutical product.
Faculty Disclosures: It is the policy of EB Medicine to ensure objectivity, balance, independence, transparency, and scientific rigor in all CME-sponsored educational activities. All faculty participating in the planning or implementation of a sponsored activity are expected to disclose to the audience any relevant financial relationships and to assist in resolving any conflict of interest that may arise from the relationship. In compliance with all ACCME Essentials, Standards, and Guidelines, all faculty for this CME activity were asked to complete a full disclosure statement. The information received is as follows: Dr. Giwa, Dr. Desai, Dr. Ogedegbe, Dr. Murphy, Dr. Abraham, Dr. Egan, Dr. Mishler, Dr. Toscano, Dr. Jagoda, and their related parties report no significant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) discussed in this educational presentation.
Commercial Support: This issue of Emergency Medicine Practice did not receive any commercial support.
Earning Credit: Two Convenient Methods: (1) Go online to www.ebmedicine.net/CME and click on the title of the article. (2) Mail or fax the CME Answer And Evaluation Form (included with your June and December issues) to EB Medicine.
Hardware/Software Requirements: You will need a Macintosh or PC to access the online archived articles and CME testing.
Additional Policies: For additional policies, including our statement of conflict of interest, source of funding, statement of informed consent, and statement of human and animal rights, visit www.ebmedicine.net/policies