Supraglottic Airway Devices for Pediatric Airway Management in the Emergency Department | Digest
Click to check your cart0

Supraglottic Airway Devices for Pediatric Airway Management in the Emergency Department

Get a FREE Issue of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice

See why tens of thousands of urgent care clinicians choose Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice to stay sharp, save time, and improve patient care.

Points & Pearls Excerpt

  • Supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) are an alternative method for pediatric airway management. They are relatively safe, easy to learn how to use, and quick to place, with a high success rate and less complications than endotracheal intubation.
  • SGAs can be used to secure a patient’s airway for oxygenation and ventilation in “can’t intubate, can’t ventilate” scenarios, and many SGAs can also be used to facilitate sequential intubation of the airway.
  • Sizing for different SGAs varies by brand and is usually weight-based in pediatric patients.
  • Laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) are commonly used SGAs, which can be placed without neuromuscular agents or laryngoscope. Frequent LMA repositioning may be required for pediatric patients.
  • Acquired conditions can cause airway difficulties and may develop as a result of infection, allergic reactions, trauma, or foreign body aspiration.

Most Important References

  • * Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42(11):1017-1023. (Meta-analysis; 52 studies) DOI: 10.1007/bf03011075
  • * Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(2):251-270. (Practice guidelines) DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2
  • * Detsky ME, Jivraj N, Adhikari NK, et al. Will this patient be difficult to intubate?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review. JAMA. 2019;321(5):493503. (Meta-analysis; 62 studies, 33,559 patients) DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.21413
To Read The Companion Article:
To Read The Companion Article:
To Read The Companion Article:
Publication Information
Authors

Jennifer E. Sanders, MD, FAAP; Louis A. Spina, MD, FAAP

Peer Reviewed By

Heather M. Kuntz, MD, FACEP, FAAP; Shira A. Schlesinger, MD, MPH, FACEP

Publication Date

October 1, 2020

CME Expiration Date

October 1, 2023   

Pub Med ID: 33001595

Get Permission

Content you might be interested in
Get A Sample Issue Of Emergency Medicine Practice
Enter your email to get your copy today! Plus receive updates on EB Medicine every month.
Verification Word:
Enter Verification Word: