0
Feedback Feedback

<< Management of Airway Obstruction and Stridor in Pediatric Patients (Pharmacology CME)

Calculated Decisions

TOC Will Appear Here

Calculated Decisions

Calculated Decisions

Calculated Decisions


Westley Croup Score
Westley Croup Score
Access Calculator
Read More

 

Westley Croup Score

 
 
The Westley Croup Score quantifies croup severity and is used to assess response to treatment, especially in clinical research.
 
 
  • The original score (Westley et al 1978) was derived to objectively measure a clinical state, in order to allow comparisons over time in response to treatment.
  • It was developed to compare the response of nebulized racemic epinephrine versus saline, not to derive a prognostic scoring system.
  • The range of values for each of the 5 clinical signs was arbitrary and each item was weighted based on the clinical implications of the most critical form of the sign.
  • A follow-up study demonstrated construct validity (Klassen 1999), with multiple studies showing high interrater reliability (Klassen 1999; Super et al 1989).

Why and When to Use, and Next Steps 

Why to Use

The Westley Croup Score is the most commonly used scoring system for croup. It was originally designed to measure severity in research settings, but in clinical practice it is often applied to prognostication.

The score may be useful in determining treatment efficacy and patient disposition. It has fair interrater reliability among clinical users, although interrater reliability is better in research studies. A change in the score correlates well with patient disposition and global assessment, as rated by both parents and by emergency department physicians. The score continues to be used in studies for treatment of croup because of its demonstrated validity and reliability among users.

When to Use

  • Croup is a clinical diagnosis based on the patient’s history and the physical examination. Consider croup (laryngotracheobronchitis) in patients aged 6 months to 6 years with acute onset of stridor, barking cough, hoarseness, and respiratory distress, sometimes concurrent with symptoms of upper respiratory infection.

  • The Westley Croup Score can be used to quantify the severity of croup. It is traditionally used for clinical research purposes to track patient response to treatment over time; it is not used clinically to guide therapy.

  • Researchers have attempted to separate viral croup from “spasmodic” (ie, recurrent, short-lived) croup, which may be due to allergic reaction or viral antigens.

  • Presentation and pathology of these 2 entities may be the same, which makes response to treatment difficult to determine. As a result, many authorities consider these entities to be part of the same disease spectrum

  • This score is traditionally used for clinical research purposes to track patient response to treatment over time.

  • The score also has been used with moderate reliability to assess for postextubation upper airway obstruction.

Next Steps

  • Severity classifications are correlated with Westley Croup Scores.

  • A 2011 Cochrane Review showed that glucocorticoids improved the Westley Croup score at 6 and 12 hours, prevented repeat visits, and decreased length of stay (Russell et al 2011).

  • The optimal glucocorticoid dose has not been determined; conventionally, the dose used is 0.6 mg/kg of dexamethasone, ad-ministered intravenously or orally (Russell et al 2011).

  • A study in Thailand compared the effectiveness of 0.15 mg/kg and 0.6 mg/kg glucocorticoid doses. The study found no difference in the mean Westley Croup Scores of the groups that received each dose; however, this was a small study (n = 41) and patients also received racemic epinephrine nebulization prior to steroid administration (Chub-Uppakarn and Sangsupawanich 2007).

Calculator Review Authors 

Joshua Beiner, MD  

Department of Emergency Medicine (Pediatrics) 

New York University Langone Medical Center 

New York, NY

Matthew Lecuyer, MD 

Department of Emergency Medicine (Pediatrics) 

Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University 

Providence, RI

Advice

Critical Actions

The Westley Croup Score was designed to track changes in the presentation of croup over time and is primarily used in research studies. Croup remains a clinical diagnosis, with the hallmark symptoms of barky cough and hoarse voice, with or without stridor.

Evidence Appraisal

The methodology for the original and follow-up validation studies (Klassen 1999; Super et al 1989) was rigorous. Both studies were prospective double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials using a stringent definition of croup, and excluded the most mild or short-lived cases through pre-enrollment standardized mist therapy for all patients.

The primary outcome common to many treatment trials that used the Westley Croup Score was a positive clinical response, defined as a reduction in the score by 2 points, or return to a score of 0 or 1 point. Mild, moderate, and severe classifications and standardized treatments were studied and developed years later.

In the interrater reliability analysis performed by Super et al (1989), identical scores were found in 75% of the cases, while the remaining scores differed by only 1 point, for a weighted kappa of 0.75. Interrater reliability analysis in Klassen et al (1999) demonstrated a weighted kappa of 0.95 ± 0.02 among research assistants and primary investigators.

Since 1994, the score has been further validated and is the main scoring criteria used in the evaluation of a patient’s response to treatment in clinical trials. In 2011, a Cochrane Review performed a meta-analysis of studies that used glucocorticoids to treat croup. The review identified 41 trials of glucocorticoids versus placebo or any other treatment modality. The analysis showed a significant improvement in the Westley Croup Score for patients at 6 and 12 hours. The Westley Croup Score was considered a primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and use of another treatment modality (Russell et al 2011).

Calculator Creator

Terry Klassen, MD

Read more about Dr. Klassen.

References

Original/Primary Reference

Validation

Other References

Copyright © MDCalc • Reprinted with permission.

back to top

 

Publication Information
Authors

Ashley Marchese, MD; Melissa L. Langhan, MD, MHS

Publication Date

November 2, 2017

CME Expiration Date

December 1, 2020

CME Credits

4 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™, 4 ACEP Category I Credits, 4 AAFP Prescribed Credits, 4 AOA Category 2-A or 2-B Credits.
Specialty CME Credits: Included as part of the 4 credits, this CME activity is eligible for 0.5 Pharmacology CME credits

Get Permission

CME Information

Related Articles

Diphtheria, Pertussis, And Tetanus: Evidence-Based Management Of Pediatric Patients In The Emergency Department - Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice - February 2017

Allergy And Anaphylaxis: Principles Of Acute Emergency Management - Emergency Medicine Practice - August 2015

Management Of Acute Asthma In The Pediatric Patient: An Evidence-Based Review (FREE) - Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice - May 2013

An Evidence-Based Approach To The Evaluation And Treatment Of Croup In Children (FREE) - Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice - September 2012

Difficulty Breathing In Infants And Young Children: An Update (FREE) - Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice - July 2011

Current Guidelines For Diagnosis And Management Of Anaphylaxis In The Emergency Department (FREE) - EM Practice Guidelines Update - June 2011

An Evidence-Based Review Of Pediatric Anaphylaxis (Trauma CME) (FREE) - Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice - Oct 2010

Pediatric Upper Airway Infectious Disease Emergencies (FREE) - Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice - November 2007

Get Quick-Read Evidence-Based Updates
Enter your email to get free evidence-based content delivered to your inbox once per month.
Please provide a valid email address.